Dynamic X-ray Microtomography vs. Laser-Doppler Vibrometry: A Comparative Study.
Details
Serval ID
serval:BIB_868484178C34
Type
Article: article from journal or magazin.
Collection
Publications
Institution
Title
Dynamic X-ray Microtomography vs. Laser-Doppler Vibrometry: A Comparative Study.
Journal
Journal of the Association for Research in Otolaryngology
ISSN
1438-7573 (Electronic)
ISSN-L
1438-7573
Publication state
Published
Issued date
02/2025
Peer-reviewed
Oui
Volume
26
Number
1
Pages
63-75
Language
english
Notes
Publication types: Journal Article ; Comparative Study
Publication Status: ppublish
Publication Status: ppublish
Abstract
There are challenges in understanding the biomechanics of the human middle ear, and established methods for studying this system show significant limitations. In this study, we evaluate a novel dynamic imaging technique based on synchrotron X-ray microtomography designed to assess the biomechanical properties of the human middle ear by comparing it to laser-Doppler vibrometry (LDV).
We examined three fresh-frozen temporal bones (TB), two donated by white males and one by a Black female, using dynamic synchrotron-based X-ray microtomography for 256 and 512 Hz, stimulated at 110 dB and 120 dB sound pressure level (SPL). In addition, we performed measurements on these TBs using 1D LDV, a well-established method.
The normalized displacement values (µm/Pa) at the umbo and the posterior crus of the stapes are consistent or within 5-10 dB differences between all LDV and dynamic microtomography measurements and previously reported literature references. In general, the overall behavior is similar between the two measurement techniques.
In conclusion, our results demonstrate the suitability of dynamic synchrotron-based X-ray microtomography in studying the middle ear's biomechanics. However, this study shows that better standardization regarding acoustic stimulation and measurement points is needed to better compare the two measurement techniques.
We examined three fresh-frozen temporal bones (TB), two donated by white males and one by a Black female, using dynamic synchrotron-based X-ray microtomography for 256 and 512 Hz, stimulated at 110 dB and 120 dB sound pressure level (SPL). In addition, we performed measurements on these TBs using 1D LDV, a well-established method.
The normalized displacement values (µm/Pa) at the umbo and the posterior crus of the stapes are consistent or within 5-10 dB differences between all LDV and dynamic microtomography measurements and previously reported literature references. In general, the overall behavior is similar between the two measurement techniques.
In conclusion, our results demonstrate the suitability of dynamic synchrotron-based X-ray microtomography in studying the middle ear's biomechanics. However, this study shows that better standardization regarding acoustic stimulation and measurement points is needed to better compare the two measurement techniques.
Keywords
Humans, X-Ray Microtomography/methods, Female, Male, Ear, Middle/diagnostic imaging, Ear, Middle/physiology, Ear, Middle/anatomy & histology, Temporal Bone/diagnostic imaging, Temporal Bone/anatomy & histology, Laser-Doppler Flowmetry/methods, Vibration, Biomechanical Phenomena, Synchrotrons, Dynamic synchrotron-based X-ray microtomography, Laser Doppler vibrometry, Middle ear, Phase-contrast
Pubmed
Web of science
Open Access
Yes
Create date
20/01/2025 17:36
Last modification date
01/03/2025 8:33