Bilateral deep brain stimulation: the placement of the second electrode is not necessarily less accurate than that of the first one.
Details
Serval ID
serval:BIB_864ED087717A
Type
Article: article from journal or magazin.
Collection
Publications
Institution
Title
Bilateral deep brain stimulation: the placement of the second electrode is not necessarily less accurate than that of the first one.
Journal
Stereotactic and Functional Neurosurgery
ISSN
1423-0372 (Electronic)
ISSN-L
1011-6125
Publication state
Published
Issued date
2015
Peer-reviewed
Oui
Volume
93
Number
3
Pages
160-167
Language
english
Notes
Publication types: Journal Article
Publication Status: ppublish
Publication Status: ppublish
Abstract
BACKGROUND: Deep brain stimulation (DBS) is recognized as an effective treatment for movement disorders. We recently changed our technique, limiting the number of brain penetrations to three per side.
OBJECTIVES: The first aim was to evaluate the electrode precision on both sides of surgery since we implemented this surgical technique. The second aim was to analyse whether or not the electrode placement was improved with microrecording and macrostimulation.
METHODS: We retrospectively reviewed operation protocols and MRIs of 30 patients who underwent bilateral DBS. For microrecording and macrostimulation, we used three parallel channels of the 'Ben Gun' centred on the MRI-planned target. Pre- and post-operative MRIs were merged. The distance between the planned target and the centre of the implanted electrode artefact was measured.
RESULTS: There was no significant difference in targeting precision on both sides of surgery. There was more intra-operative adjustment of the second electrode positioning based on microrecording and macrostimulation, which allowed to significantly approach the MRI-planned target on the medial-lateral axis.
CONCLUSION: There was more electrode adjustment needed on the second side, possibly in relation with brain shift. We thus suggest performing a single central track with electrophysiological and clinical assessment, with multidirectional exploration on demand for suboptimal clinical responses.
OBJECTIVES: The first aim was to evaluate the electrode precision on both sides of surgery since we implemented this surgical technique. The second aim was to analyse whether or not the electrode placement was improved with microrecording and macrostimulation.
METHODS: We retrospectively reviewed operation protocols and MRIs of 30 patients who underwent bilateral DBS. For microrecording and macrostimulation, we used three parallel channels of the 'Ben Gun' centred on the MRI-planned target. Pre- and post-operative MRIs were merged. The distance between the planned target and the centre of the implanted electrode artefact was measured.
RESULTS: There was no significant difference in targeting precision on both sides of surgery. There was more intra-operative adjustment of the second electrode positioning based on microrecording and macrostimulation, which allowed to significantly approach the MRI-planned target on the medial-lateral axis.
CONCLUSION: There was more electrode adjustment needed on the second side, possibly in relation with brain shift. We thus suggest performing a single central track with electrophysiological and clinical assessment, with multidirectional exploration on demand for suboptimal clinical responses.
Keywords
Aged, Deep Brain Stimulation/instrumentation, Deep Brain Stimulation/standards, Electrodes, Implanted/standards, Female, Humans, Male, Middle Aged, Monitoring, Intraoperative/methods, Monitoring, Intraoperative/standards, Movement Disorders/diagnosis, Movement Disorders/therapy, Retrospective Studies, Subthalamic Nucleus/physiology
Pubmed
Web of science
Create date
20/06/2015 8:37
Last modification date
20/08/2019 14:45