Intracoronary Brachytherapy for Restenosis: 20 Years of Follow-Up.
Details
Serval ID
serval:BIB_7F25E04F0A6D
Type
Article: article from journal or magazin.
Collection
Publications
Institution
Title
Intracoronary Brachytherapy for Restenosis: 20 Years of Follow-Up.
Journal
Cardiovascular revascularization medicine
ISSN
1878-0938 (Electronic)
ISSN-L
1878-0938
Publication state
Published
Issued date
09/2023
Peer-reviewed
Oui
Volume
54
Pages
1-4
Language
english
Notes
Publication types: Journal Article
Publication Status: ppublish
Publication Status: ppublish
Abstract
Intracoronary brachytherapy (ICB) has mainly been used to treat in-stent restenosis following percutaneous coronary intervention and was virtually abandoned about 20 years ago. However, patients treated with this strategy are still alive and some teams continue to perform this therapy. We aimed to investigate the very long-term clinical outcome of patients treated with ICB.
A total of 173 consecutive patients who had been treated with ICB at a large tertiary referral centre between 1998 and 2003 were included. The primary endpoint of the study was all-cause mortality. The secondary endpoints were as follows: occurrence of major adverse cardiac events (MACE, defined as all-cause death, non-fatal myocardial infarction, or target vessel revascularization), cardiac death, and presence of angina at the end of follow-up.
Patients' mean age at the time of ICB was 64 ± 10 years and 77 % were male. Restenosis (bare metal stent vs. balloon angioplasty) was the only indication for ICB. Unstable angina was present in 34 % of the patients. Follow-up was available for 166 patients. After a mean follow-up of 20 ± 1.3 years, 66 % of the patients had died (including 74 patients (67 %) with cardiac death). Cumulative MACE rate at 20 years was 96 %.
Very long-term follow-up of patients with in-stent restenosis treated with ICB confirmed a high all-cause mortality rate mainly due to cardiac causes and MACEs.
A total of 173 consecutive patients who had been treated with ICB at a large tertiary referral centre between 1998 and 2003 were included. The primary endpoint of the study was all-cause mortality. The secondary endpoints were as follows: occurrence of major adverse cardiac events (MACE, defined as all-cause death, non-fatal myocardial infarction, or target vessel revascularization), cardiac death, and presence of angina at the end of follow-up.
Patients' mean age at the time of ICB was 64 ± 10 years and 77 % were male. Restenosis (bare metal stent vs. balloon angioplasty) was the only indication for ICB. Unstable angina was present in 34 % of the patients. Follow-up was available for 166 patients. After a mean follow-up of 20 ± 1.3 years, 66 % of the patients had died (including 74 patients (67 %) with cardiac death). Cumulative MACE rate at 20 years was 96 %.
Very long-term follow-up of patients with in-stent restenosis treated with ICB confirmed a high all-cause mortality rate mainly due to cardiac causes and MACEs.
Keywords
Humans, Male, Female, Brachytherapy/adverse effects, Follow-Up Studies, Treatment Outcome, Coronary Restenosis/diagnostic imaging, Coronary Restenosis/etiology, Coronary Restenosis/radiotherapy, Coronary Angiography/adverse effects, Stents/adverse effects, Constriction, Pathologic, Death, Coronary disease, Intracoronary brachytherapy, Percutaneous coronary intervention, Restenosis
Pubmed
Web of science
Open Access
Yes
Create date
01/05/2023 9:42
Last modification date
19/12/2023 7:22