Automatic quantification of scapular and glenoid morphology from CT scans using deep learning.
Details
Serval ID
serval:BIB_7DDBB61FACDD
Type
Article: article from journal or magazin.
Collection
Publications
Institution
Title
Automatic quantification of scapular and glenoid morphology from CT scans using deep learning.
Journal
European journal of radiology
ISSN
1872-7727 (Electronic)
ISSN-L
0720-048X
Publication state
Published
Issued date
08/2024
Peer-reviewed
Oui
Volume
177
Pages
111588
Language
english
Notes
Publication types: Journal Article
Publication Status: ppublish
Publication Status: ppublish
Abstract
To develop and validate an open-source deep learning model for automatically quantifying scapular and glenoid morphology using CT images of normal subjects and patients with glenohumeral osteoarthritis.
First, we used deep learning to segment the scapula from CT images and then to identify the location of 13 landmarks on the scapula, 9 of them to establish a coordinate system unaffected by osteoarthritis-related changes, and the remaining 4 landmarks on the glenoid cavity to determine the glenoid size and orientation in this scapular coordinate system. The glenoid version, glenoid inclination, critical shoulder angle, glenopolar angle, glenoid height, and glenoid width were subsequently measured in this coordinate system. A 5-fold cross-validation was performed to evaluate the performance of this approach on 60 normal/non-osteoarthritic and 56 pathological/osteoarthritic scapulae.
The Dice similarity coefficient between manual and automatic scapular segmentations exceeded 0.97 in both normal and pathological cases. The average error in automatic scapular and glenoid landmark positioning ranged between 1 and 2.5 mm and was comparable between the automatic method and human raters. The automatic method provided acceptable estimates of glenoid version (R <sup>2</sup> = 0.95), glenoid inclination (R <sup>2</sup> = 0.93), critical shoulder angle (R <sup>2</sup> = 0.95), glenopolar angle (R <sup>2</sup> = 0.90), glenoid height (R <sup>2</sup> = 0.88) and width (R <sup>2</sup> = 0.94). However, a significant difference was found for glenoid inclination between manual and automatic measurements (p < 0.001).
This open-source deep learning model enables the automatic quantification of scapular and glenoid morphology from CT scans of patients with glenohumeral osteoarthritis, with sufficient accuracy for clinical use.
First, we used deep learning to segment the scapula from CT images and then to identify the location of 13 landmarks on the scapula, 9 of them to establish a coordinate system unaffected by osteoarthritis-related changes, and the remaining 4 landmarks on the glenoid cavity to determine the glenoid size and orientation in this scapular coordinate system. The glenoid version, glenoid inclination, critical shoulder angle, glenopolar angle, glenoid height, and glenoid width were subsequently measured in this coordinate system. A 5-fold cross-validation was performed to evaluate the performance of this approach on 60 normal/non-osteoarthritic and 56 pathological/osteoarthritic scapulae.
The Dice similarity coefficient between manual and automatic scapular segmentations exceeded 0.97 in both normal and pathological cases. The average error in automatic scapular and glenoid landmark positioning ranged between 1 and 2.5 mm and was comparable between the automatic method and human raters. The automatic method provided acceptable estimates of glenoid version (R <sup>2</sup> = 0.95), glenoid inclination (R <sup>2</sup> = 0.93), critical shoulder angle (R <sup>2</sup> = 0.95), glenopolar angle (R <sup>2</sup> = 0.90), glenoid height (R <sup>2</sup> = 0.88) and width (R <sup>2</sup> = 0.94). However, a significant difference was found for glenoid inclination between manual and automatic measurements (p < 0.001).
This open-source deep learning model enables the automatic quantification of scapular and glenoid morphology from CT scans of patients with glenohumeral osteoarthritis, with sufficient accuracy for clinical use.
Keywords
Humans, Deep Learning, Scapula/diagnostic imaging, Tomography, X-Ray Computed/methods, Osteoarthritis/diagnostic imaging, Male, Female, Shoulder Joint/diagnostic imaging, Middle Aged, Aged, Glenoid Cavity/diagnostic imaging, Adult, Reproducibility of Results, Anatomic Landmarks/diagnostic imaging, Radiographic Image Interpretation, Computer-Assisted/methods, Computed tomography, Deep learning, Morphometry, Osteoarthritis, Shoulder
Pubmed
Web of science
Open Access
Yes
Create date
04/07/2024 7:32
Last modification date
11/09/2024 6:21