Performance of the Digital Dietary Assessment Tool MyFoodRepo.

Details

Ressource 1Download: 35276994_BIB_7C34A16CB6E8.pdf (4485.78 [Ko])
State: Public
Version: Final published version
License: CC BY 4.0
Serval ID
serval:BIB_7C34A16CB6E8
Type
Article: article from journal or magazin.
Collection
Publications
Institution
Title
Performance of the Digital Dietary Assessment Tool MyFoodRepo.
Journal
Nutrients
Author(s)
Zuppinger C., Taffé P., Burger G., Badran-Amstutz W., Niemi T., Cornuz C., Belle F.N., Chatelan A., Paclet Lafaille M., Bochud M., Gonseth Nusslé S.
ISSN
2072-6643 (Electronic)
ISSN-L
2072-6643
Publication state
Published
Issued date
01/02/2022
Peer-reviewed
Oui
Volume
14
Number
3
Pages
635
Language
english
Notes
Publication types: Journal Article
Publication Status: epublish
Abstract
Digital dietary assessment devices could help overcome the limitations of traditional tools to assess dietary intake in clinical and/or epidemiological studies. We evaluated the accuracy of the automated dietary app MyFoodRepo (MFR) against controlled reference values from weighted food diaries (WFD). MFR's capability to identify, classify and analyze the content of 189 different records was assessed using Cohen and uniform kappa coefficients and linear regressions. MFR identified 98.0% ± 1.5 of all edible components and was not affected by increasing numbers of ingredients. Linear regression analysis showed wide limits of agreement between MFR and WFD methods to estimate energy, carbohydrates, fat, proteins, fiber and alcohol contents of all records and a constant overestimation of proteins, likely reflecting the overestimation of portion sizes for meat, fish and seafood. The MFR mean portion size error was 9.2% ± 48.1 with individual errors ranging between -88.5% and +242.5% compared to true values. Beverages were impacted by the app's difficulty in correctly identifying the nature of liquids (41.9% ± 17.7 of composed beverages correctly classified). Fair estimations of portion size by MFR, along with its strong segmentation and classification capabilities, resulted in a generally good agreement between MFR and WFD which would be suited for the identification of dietary patterns, eating habits and regime types.
Keywords
Diet Records, Diet Surveys, Eating, Nutrition Assessment, Portion Size, accuracy, app, diet, dietary assessment, food intake, mobile food record, validation
Pubmed
Web of science
Open Access
Yes
Create date
21/03/2022 9:15
Last modification date
24/09/2024 6:19
Usage data