Does Orthodoxy of Knowledge Polarize Social Anchoring?. Representations of the Market as a Function of Academic Major and Subjective Knowledge in Economics

Details

Ressource 1Download: BIB_7BE804577176.P001.pdf (256.18 [Ko])
State: Public
Version: Final published version
Serval ID
serval:BIB_7BE804577176
Type
Article: article from journal or magazin.
Collection
Publications
Title
Does Orthodoxy of Knowledge Polarize Social Anchoring?. Representations of the Market as a Function of Academic Major and Subjective Knowledge in Economics
Journal
Papers on Social Representations
Author(s)
Scheidegger R., Tüscher T.
ISSN
1021-5573
Publication state
Published
Issued date
2010
Peer-reviewed
Oui
Volume
19
Number
2
Pages
25.1-25.22
Language
english
Abstract
This research examines hegemonic social representations of the economic system as a function of academic majors and subjective knowledge in economics. The results evidenced that studying social and political sciences (N = 205) and literature (N = 190), was linked to hierarchy attenuating orientation, and geared to a subversive stance towards the market. In contrast, majoring in business (N = 140) and law (N = 98) was linked to a weaker hierarchy attenuating orientation, and led to a market legitimizing stance. Moreover, subjective knowledge in economics polarized these effects primarily in majors in which economic issues were of academic interest, that is, in business and social and political sciences. This research, which sought to articulate hierarchy enhancing/attenuating beliefs with hegemonic/subversive social representations, highlights the function of the orthodoxy of knowledge in the academic anchoring of social representations.
Keywords
Academic anchoring, orthodoxy of knowledge, hegemonic/subversive social representation, HE/HA institutions
Create date
22/11/2010 13:42
Last modification date
20/08/2019 14:37
Usage data