Identification of imaging selection patterns in acute ischemic stroke patients and the influence on treatment and clinical trial enrollment decision making.

Details

Ressource 1Download: BIB_7A95B4A12115.P001.pdf (421.35 [Ko])
State: Public
Version: author
Serval ID
serval:BIB_7A95B4A12115
Type
Article: article from journal or magazin.
Collection
Publications
Institution
Title
Identification of imaging selection patterns in acute ischemic stroke patients and the influence on treatment and clinical trial enrollment decision making.
Journal
International journal of stroke : official journal of the International Stroke Society
Author(s)
Luby M., Warach S.J., Albers G.W., Baron J.C., Cognard C., Dávalos A., Donnan G.A., Fiebach J.B., Fiehler J., Hacke W., Lansberg M.G., Liebeskind D.S., Mattle H.P., Oppenheim C., Schellinger P.D., Wardlaw J.M., Wintermark M.
ISSN
1747-4949 (Electronic)
ISSN-L
1747-4930
Publication state
Published
Issued date
02/2016
Peer-reviewed
Oui
Volume
11
Number
2
Pages
180-190
Language
english
Notes
Publication types: Journal Article ; Research Support, N.I.H., Extramural ; Research Support, Non-U.S. Gov't
Publication Status: ppublish
Abstract
For the STroke Imaging Research (STIR) and VISTA-Imaging Investigators The purpose of this study was to collect precise information on the typical imaging decisions given specific clinical acute stroke scenarios. Stroke centers worldwide were surveyed regarding typical imaging used to work up representative acute stroke patients, make treatment decisions, and willingness to enroll in clinical trials.
STroke Imaging Research and Virtual International Stroke Trials Archive-Imaging circulated an online survey of clinical case vignettes through its website, the websites of national professional societies from multiple countries as well as through email distribution lists from STroke Imaging Research and participating societies. Survey responders were asked to select the typical imaging work-up for each clinical vignette presented. Actual images were not presented to the survey responders. Instead, the survey then displayed several types of imaging findings offered by the imaging strategy, and the responders selected the appropriate therapy and whether to enroll into a clinical trial considering time from onset, clinical presentation, and imaging findings. A follow-up survey focusing on 6 h from onset was conducted after the release of the positive endovascular trials.
We received 548 responses from 35 countries including 282 individual centers; 78% of the centers originating from Australia, Brazil, France, Germany, Spain, United Kingdom, and United States. The specific onset windows presented influenced the type of imaging work-up selected more than the clinical scenario. Magnetic Resonance Imaging usage (27-28%) was substantial, in particular for wake-up stroke. Following the release of the positive trials, selection of perfusion imaging significantly increased for imaging strategy.
Usage of vascular or perfusion imaging by Computed Tomography or Magnetic Resonance Imaging beyond just parenchymal imaging was the primary work-up (62-87%) across all clinical vignettes and time windows. Perfusion imaging with Computed Tomography or Magnetic Resonance Imaging was associated with increased probability of enrollment into clinical trials for 0-3 h. Following the release of the positive endovascular trials, selection of endovascular only treatment for 6 h increased across all clinical vignettes.

Keywords
Humans, Neuroimaging/statistics & numerical data, Patient Selection, Stroke/diagnosis, Stroke/therapy, Surveys and Questionnaires
Pubmed
Create date
19/02/2016 20:56
Last modification date
20/08/2019 15:36
Usage data