Results from a multicenter, noninterventional registry study for multiple myeloma patients who received stem cell mobilization regimens with and without plerixafor.

Details

Serval ID
serval:BIB_79CFAA3526C7
Type
Article: article from journal or magazin.
Collection
Publications
Title
Results from a multicenter, noninterventional registry study for multiple myeloma patients who received stem cell mobilization regimens with and without plerixafor.
Journal
Bone marrow transplantation
Author(s)
Morris C., Chabannon C., Masszi T., Russell N., Nahi H., Kobbe G., Krejci M., Auner H.W., Pohlreich D., Hayden P., Basak G.W., Lenhoff S., Schaap N., van Biezen A., Knol C., Iacobelli S., Liu Q., Celanovic M., Garderet L., Kröger N.
ISSN
1476-5365 (Electronic)
ISSN-L
0268-3369
Publication state
Published
Issued date
02/2020
Peer-reviewed
Oui
Volume
55
Number
2
Pages
356-366
Language
english
Notes
Publication types: Journal Article ; Multicenter Study ; Research Support, Non-U.S. Gov't
Publication Status: ppublish
Abstract
Plerixafor plus granulocyte-colony stimulating factor (G-CSF) enhances the mobilization of hematopoietic stem cells (HSCs) for collection and subsequent autologous hematopoietic stem cell transplantation (HSCT) in patients with multiple myeloma (MM). This international, multicenter, noninterventional registry study (NCT01362972), evaluated long-term outcomes for MM patients who received plerixafor versus other mobilization regimens. The comparisons were: G-CSF + plerixafor (G-CSF + P) versus G-CSF-; G-CSF + P versus G-CSF + chemotherapy (G-CSF + C); and G-CSF + P + C versus G-CSF + C. Propensity score matching was used to balance groups. Primary outcome measures were progression free survival (PFS), overall survival (OS), and cumulative incidence of relapse (CIR) after transplantation. After propensity matching, 77 versus 41 patients in the G-CSF + P versus G-CSF cohorts, 129 versus 129 in the G-CSF + P versus G-CSF + C cohorts, and 117 versus 117 in the G-CSF + P + C versus G-CSF + C cohorts were matched, respectively. Propensity score matching resulted in a smaller sample size and imbalances were not completely overcome. For both PFS and OS, the upper limits of the hazard ratio 95% confidence intervals exceeded prespecified boundaries; noninferiority was not demonstrated. CIR rates were higher in the plerixafor cohorts. G-CSF + P remains an option for the mobilization of HSCs in poor mobilizers with MM with no substantial differences in PFS, OS, and CIR in comparison with other regimens.
Keywords
Benzylamines, Cyclams, Hematopoietic Stem Cell Mobilization, Heterocyclic Compounds, Humans, Multiple Myeloma/therapy, Neoplasm Recurrence, Local, Registries
Pubmed
Web of science
Open Access
Yes
Create date
02/12/2024 16:49
Last modification date
04/12/2024 7:07
Usage data