Impact of the Menstrual Cycle on the Cardiovascular and Ventilatory Responses During Exercise in Normoxia and Hypoxia.

Details

Ressource 1Download: 464. Citherlet HAMB24 Impact-of-the-menstrual-cycle-on-the-cardiovascular-and-ventilatory-responses-during-exercise-in.pdf (663.08 [Ko])
State: Public
Version: Final published version
License: CC BY 4.0
Serval ID
serval:BIB_798C8428F722
Type
Article: article from journal or magazin.
Collection
Publications
Institution
Title
Impact of the Menstrual Cycle on the Cardiovascular and Ventilatory Responses During Exercise in Normoxia and Hypoxia.
Journal
High altitude medicine & biology
Author(s)
Citherlet T., Raberin A., Manferdelli G., Bourdillon N., Millet G.P.
ISSN
1557-8682 (Electronic)
ISSN-L
1527-0297
Publication state
Published
Issued date
03/2025
Peer-reviewed
Oui
Volume
26
Number
1
Pages
55-62
Language
english
Notes
Publication types: Journal Article
Publication Status: ppublish
Abstract
Citherlet, Tom, Antoine Raberin, Giorgio Manferdelli, Nicolas Bourdillon, and Grégoire P Millet. Impact of the menstrual cycle on the cardiovascular and ventilatory responses during exercise in normoxia and hypoxia. High Alt Med Biol. 26:55-62, 2025. Introduction: Ovarian hormones influence several physiological functions in women. This study investigated how the hormonal variations across the menstrual cycle (MC) impact cardiovascular and ventilatory responses during rest and moderate exercise in normobaric hypoxia. Methods: Thirteen eumenorrheic women were tested during the early follicular (Fol1), late follicular (Fol2), and mid-luteal (Lut3) phases with measurement of hormonal levels. Heart rate (HR) variability, blood pressure, and baroreflex sensitivity (BRS) were evaluated at rest in normoxia. Ventilation (VE), peripheral oxygen saturation, and HR were monitored at rest and during moderate-intensity cycling exercise in hypoxia (F <sub>i</sub> O <sub>2</sub> = 14%). Results: Despite expected hormone level variations, no significant changes were observed across the MC in HR variability (root mean square of successive differences; 64 (95% confidence interval [47, 81]) at Fol1, 54 [42, 66] at Fol2, 60 [44, 77] ms at Lut3), blood pressure (mean blood pressure; 85 [79, 90]), 87 [81, 93]), 84 [77, 92] mmHg), BRS (26 [17, 36], 28 [20, 35], 23 [17, 29] ms/mmHg), VE (rest: 8.9 [7.9, 9.8], 9.5 [9.0, 9.9], 9.0 [8.1, 9.9]; exercise: 53 [41, 66], 51.1 [36.4, 65.7], 54.4 [34.0, 74.8] l/min), peripheral oxygen saturation (rest: 89.8 [87.4, 92.1], 91.9 [88.7, 95.0], 90.2 [87.8, 92.6]; exercise: 80.5 [77.4, 83.5], 84.4 [80.4, 88.3], 81.9 [78.3, 85.4] %) HR (rest: 69.7 [60.2, 79.1], 70.8 [63.2, 78.3], 70.5 [64.0, 77.0]; exercise: 148 [136, 160], 146 [132, 161], 146 [132, 160] bpm), and cycling efficiency (0.17 [0.16, 0.18], 0.17 [0.13, 0.21], 0.16 [0.15, 0.18] %) (all p > 0.05). Discussion: From a practical point of view, there is no strong evidence of any usefulness of monitoring hormonal variations and the MC phases for women exercising in hypoxia.
Keywords
Humans, Female, Hypoxia/physiopathology, Heart Rate/physiology, Exercise/physiology, Menstrual Cycle/physiology, Adult, Blood Pressure/physiology, Young Adult, Baroreflex/physiology, Pulmonary Ventilation/physiology, Oxygen Saturation/physiology, altitude, autonomic control, estradiol, female, progesterone, pulse oximetry
Pubmed
Web of science
Open Access
Yes
Create date
30/09/2024 13:34
Last modification date
12/03/2025 8:15
Usage data