Dynamic contrast-enhanced MRI perfusion quantification in hepatocellular carcinoma: comparison of gadoxetate disodium and gadobenate dimeglumine.

Details

Serval ID
serval:BIB_74E6AD2CF576
Type
Article: article from journal or magazin.
Collection
Publications
Institution
Title
Dynamic contrast-enhanced MRI perfusion quantification in hepatocellular carcinoma: comparison of gadoxetate disodium and gadobenate dimeglumine.
Journal
European radiology
Author(s)
Stocker D., Hectors S., Bane O., Vietti-Violi N., Said D., Kennedy P., Cuevas J., Cunha G.M., Sirlin C.B., Fowler K.J., Lewis S., Taouli B.
ISSN
1432-1084 (Electronic)
ISSN-L
0938-7994
Publication state
Published
Issued date
12/2021
Peer-reviewed
Oui
Volume
31
Number
12
Pages
9306-9315
Language
english
Notes
Publication types: Journal Article
Publication Status: ppublish
Abstract
(1) To assess the quality of the arterial input function (AIF) during dynamic contrast-enhanced (DCE) MRI of the liver and (2) to quantify perfusion parameters of hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) and liver parenchyma during the first 3 min post-contrast injection with DCE-MRI using gadoxetate disodium compared to gadobenate dimeglumine (Gd-BOPTA) in different patient populations.
In this prospective study, we evaluated 66 patients with 83 HCCs who underwent DCE-MRI, using gadoxetate disodium (group 1, n = 28) or Gd-BOPTA (group 2, n = 38). AIF qualitative and quantitative features were assessed. Perfusion parameters (based on the initial 3 min post-contrast) were extracted in tumours and liver parenchyma, including model-free parameters (time-to-peak enhancement (TTP), time-to-washout) and modelled parameters (arterial flow (F <sub>a</sub> ), portal venous flow (F <sub>p</sub> ), total flow (F <sub>t</sub> ), arterial fraction, mean transit time (MTT), distribution volume (DV)). In addition, lesion-to-liver contrast ratios (LLCRs) were measured. Fisher's exact tests and Mann-Whitney U tests were used to compare the two groups.
AIF quality, modelled and model-free perfusion parameters in HCC were similar between the 2 groups (p = 0.054-0.932). Liver parenchymal flow was lower and liver enhancement occurred later in group 1 vs group 2 (F <sub>p</sub> , p = 0.002; F <sub>t</sub> , p = 0.001; TTP, MTT, all p < 0.001), while there were no significant differences in tumour LLCR (max. positive LLCR, p = 0.230; max. negative LLCR, p = 0.317).
Gadoxetate disodium provides comparable AIF quality and HCC perfusion parameters compared to Gd-BOPTA during dynamic phases. Despite delayed and decreased liver enhancement with gadoxetate disodium, LLCRs were equivalent between contrast agents, indicating similar tumour conspicuity.
• Arterial input function quality, modelled, and model-free dynamic parameters measured in hepatocellular carcinoma are similar in patients receiving gadoxetate disodium or gadobenate dimeglumine during the first 3 min post injection. • Gadoxetate disodium and gadobenate dimeglumine show similar lesion-to-liver contrast ratios during dynamic phases in patients with HCC. • There is lower portal and lower total hepatic flow and longer hepatic mean transit time and time-to-peak with gadoxetate disodium compared to gadobenate dimeglumine.
Keywords
Carcinoma, Hepatocellular/diagnostic imaging, Contrast Media, Gadolinium DTPA, Humans, Liver Neoplasms/diagnostic imaging, Magnetic Resonance Imaging, Meglumine/analogs & derivatives, Organometallic Compounds, Perfusion, Prospective Studies, Carcinoma, hepatocellular, Gadobenate dimeglumine, Gadoxetate, Liver neoplasms, Magnetic resonance imaging
Pubmed
Web of science
Create date
11/06/2021 17:06
Last modification date
06/09/2022 5:40
Usage data