Purpose: To compare entero-MDCT with entero-MRI performed for suspicion of acute exacerbation of known Crohn's disease.
Methods and Materials: Fifty-seven patients (mean age 33.5) with histologically proven Crohn's disease were prospectively included. They presented with clinical symptoms suggesting acute exacerbation to the emergency department. After oral administration of 1-2 l of 5% methylcellulosis (+syrup), entero-MDCT and entero- MRI were performed on each patient (mean delay 1 day). Three experienced radiologists blindly and independently evaluated each examination for technical quality, eight pathological CT features (bowel wall thickening, pathological wall enhancement, stenosis, lymphadenopathy, mesenteric haziness, intraperitoneal fluid, abscess, fistula) and final main diagnosis. Interobserver agreement kappa was calculated. Sensitivity and specificity resulted from comparison with the reference standard, consisting of operation (n= 30) and long-time follow-up in case of conservative treatment (n=27).
Results: Entero-MDCT demonstrated considerably less artefacts than entero-MRI (p 0.0001). In 9 entero-MDCT/-MRI, no activity of Crohn's disease was seen, whereas in 48 entero-MDCT/-MRI active disease could be demonstrated, such as intraperitoneal abscesses (n=11), fistulas (n=13), stenoses (n=23), acute (n=15) or chronic (n=23) inflammation. Interobserver agreement of the three readers was not significantly different between entero-MDCT and -MRI, neither was sensitivity (range 60-89%) and specificity (range 75-100%) for each of the eight pathological features or for the main diagnosis.
Conclusion: Entero-MRI is statistically of similar diagnostic value as entero-MDCT for acute complications of Crohn's disease. Therefore, entero-IRM, devoid of harmful irradiation, should become the preferred imaging modality, since we deal with young patients, very likely exposed to frequent imaging controls in the future.