Exploring reasons for recruitment failure in clinical trials: a qualitative study with clinical trial stakeholders in Switzerland, Germany, and Canada.

Details

Ressource 1Download: 34823582_BIB_69882A8C830E.pdf (601.43 [Ko])
State: Public
Version: Final published version
License: CC BY 4.0
Serval ID
serval:BIB_69882A8C830E
Type
Article: article from journal or magazin.
Collection
Publications
Institution
Title
Exploring reasons for recruitment failure in clinical trials: a qualitative study with clinical trial stakeholders in Switzerland, Germany, and Canada.
Journal
Trials
Author(s)
Briel M., Elger B.S., McLennan S., Schandelmaier S., von Elm E., Satalkar P.
ISSN
1745-6215 (Electronic)
ISSN-L
1745-6215
Publication state
Published
Issued date
25/11/2021
Peer-reviewed
Oui
Volume
22
Number
1
Pages
844
Language
english
Notes
Publication types: Journal Article
Publication Status: epublish
Abstract
Poor participant recruitment is the most frequent reason for premature discontinuation of randomized clinical trials (RCTs), particularly if they are investigator-initiated. The aims of this qualitative study were to investigate (1) the views of clinical trial stakeholders from three different countries regarding reasons for recruitment failure in RCTs and (2) how these compare and contrast with the causes identified in a previous systematic review of RCT publications.
From August 2015 to November 2016, we conducted 49 semi-structured interviews with a purposive sample of clinical trial stakeholders. This included investigators based in Germany (n = 9), Switzerland (n = 6) and Canada (n = 1) with personal experience of a discontinued RCT and 33 other stakeholders (e.g., representatives of ethics committees, clinical trial units, pharmaceutical industry) in Switzerland. Individual semi-structured qualitative interviews were conducted and analyzed using thematic analysis.
Interviewees identified a total of 29 different reasons for recruitment failure. Overoptimistic recruitment estimates, too narrow eligibility criteria, lack of engagement of recruiters/trial team, lack of competence/training/experience of recruiters, insufficient initial funding, and high burden for trial participants were mentioned most frequently. The interview findings largely confirm the previous systematic review on published reasons for recruitment failure. However, eight new reasons for recruitment failure were identified in the interviews, which led to the checklist of reasons for recruitment failure being revised and a new category describing research environment-related factors being added.
This study highlights the diversity of often interlinked reasons for recruitment failure in RCTs. Integrating the findings of this interview study with a previous systematic review of RCT publications led to a comprehensive, structured checklist of empirically-informed reasons for recruitment failure. The checklist may be useful to guide further research on interventions to improve participant recruitment in RCTs and helpful for trial investigators, research ethics committees, and funding agencies when assessing trial feasibility with respect to recruitment.
Keywords
Ethics Committees, Research, Germany, Humans, Patient Selection, Qualitative Research, Switzerland, Interview study, Poor recruitment, Qualitative analysis, Randomized clinical trials, Reasons for recruitment failure
Pubmed
Web of science
Open Access
Yes
Create date
03/12/2021 12:10
Last modification date
08/08/2024 7:34
Usage data