Experiences of cancer care in COVID-19: A longitudinal qualitative study.
Details
Request a copy Under indefinite embargo.
UNIL restricted access
State: Public
Version: author
License: Not specified
UNIL restricted access
State: Public
Version: author
License: Not specified
Serval ID
serval:BIB_5D9F2E70AB8A
Type
Article: article from journal or magazin.
Collection
Publications
Institution
Title
Experiences of cancer care in COVID-19: A longitudinal qualitative study.
Journal
European journal of oncology nursing
ISSN
1532-2122 (Electronic)
ISSN-L
1462-3889
Publication state
Published
Issued date
18/10/2022
Peer-reviewed
Oui
Volume
61
Pages
102228
Language
english
Notes
Publication types: Journal Article
Publication Status: ppublish
Publication Status: ppublish
Abstract
This study aimed to explore the cancer care experiences of people living with and beyond cancer during COVID-19 in Ireland.
The study adopted a longitudinal qualitative design using semi-structured interviews with sixteen participants. Interviews were undertaken on three occasions over six months (January-June 2021). The National Comprehensive Cancer Network Distress Thermometer (NCCN DT), and Connor-Davidson-Resilience Scale (CD-RISC2) were also used as part of the interviews to measure distress and resilience. Thematic analysis of interview data was conducted and participants' self-rating for distress and resilience was analysed using descriptive statistics.
Sixteen patients participated. The findings revealed participants' constant fear of COVID-19 over time and efforts to stay safe by following the 'rules'. Isolation was a common experience as COVID-19 restrictions resulted in being alone when attending the hospital for treatment and limited support from family and friends. Telephone follow-up was limited in terms of support and patients' opportunity to ask questions. For a minority, COVID-19 restrictions meant they were 'not missing out'. On average, participants reported moderate to high levels of resilience at all time points. Distress scores were low but trended upwards from T1 to T2.
The findings highlight the need to avoid restrictions on carers accompanying their close relatives to the hospital for treatment. An evaluation of the effects of the rapid introduction of telephone follow-up on patient outcomes is warranted.
The study adopted a longitudinal qualitative design using semi-structured interviews with sixteen participants. Interviews were undertaken on three occasions over six months (January-June 2021). The National Comprehensive Cancer Network Distress Thermometer (NCCN DT), and Connor-Davidson-Resilience Scale (CD-RISC2) were also used as part of the interviews to measure distress and resilience. Thematic analysis of interview data was conducted and participants' self-rating for distress and resilience was analysed using descriptive statistics.
Sixteen patients participated. The findings revealed participants' constant fear of COVID-19 over time and efforts to stay safe by following the 'rules'. Isolation was a common experience as COVID-19 restrictions resulted in being alone when attending the hospital for treatment and limited support from family and friends. Telephone follow-up was limited in terms of support and patients' opportunity to ask questions. For a minority, COVID-19 restrictions meant they were 'not missing out'. On average, participants reported moderate to high levels of resilience at all time points. Distress scores were low but trended upwards from T1 to T2.
The findings highlight the need to avoid restrictions on carers accompanying their close relatives to the hospital for treatment. An evaluation of the effects of the rapid introduction of telephone follow-up on patient outcomes is warranted.
Keywords
Humans, COVID-19, Qualitative Research, Caregivers, Telephone, Neoplasms/therapy, Cancer, Cancer care, Distress, Experiences of care, Qualitative, Resilience, Telemedicine
Pubmed
Web of science
Open Access
Yes
Create date
18/10/2021 6:43
Last modification date
20/07/2023 5:56