Concurrent chemotherapy (CT) and radiotherapy (RT) in locally advanced non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC): a review
Details
Serval ID
serval:BIB_5C998DA02C35
Type
Article: article from journal or magazin.
Publication sub-type
Review (review): journal as complete as possible of one specific subject, written based on exhaustive analyses from published work.
Collection
Publications
Institution
Title
Concurrent chemotherapy (CT) and radiotherapy (RT) in locally advanced non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC): a review
Journal
Lung Cancer
ISSN
0169-5002 (Print)
Publication state
Published
Issued date
11/1994
Volume
11 Suppl 3
Pages
S79-99
Notes
Journal Article
Review --- Old month value: Nov
Review --- Old month value: Nov
Abstract
Stage III or locally advanced non-metastatic, non-small cell lung cancers comprise about 40% of all NSCLC. A proportion of patients with Stage III NSCLC can be treated by induction RT/CT followed by surgery, but the majority, in particular all Stage IIIB, are not candidates for this approach. For these patients, RT alone is generally considered as the standard treatment. RT has a modest, but definitive curative potential, with 1-, 2-, and 5-year survivals of about 40%, 20% and 5%, respectively, and median survival of 9-12 months. Combination CT-RT, depending on its type and rationale, is aimed at improving survival via a decrease of local or distant failure rates or both. Combined modality (CM) can be subdivided into 3 categories: sequential, concomitant and alternated regimes. Concomitant and alternated CT-RT have some common characteristics and rationale, the overall time playing a central role. This paper reviews studies of inoperable NSCLC treated with these CM, excluding sequential CT-RT trials, which would require a separate discussion. Numerous Phase I-II studies have been recently published on concomitant or alternated schemes and 33 of them are presented in this paper. Although it is hazardous to readily compare their results with those of RT-alone studies, several trials using platin-based combination chemotherapy, concurrently or alternated with RT, have shown impressive response rates and encouraging survivals, at a price of significant toxicity. Seven randomized trials comparing RT alone versus concomitant CT-RT are now available: the 3 non-cisplatin trials have failed to show any improvement in survival with CM, whereas among the 4 cisplatin trials, only one demonstrated a benefit with low-dose cisplatin added to RT. Implications for future clinical research will be discussed.
Keywords
Carcinoma, Non-Small-Cell Lung/*therapy
Clinical Trials
Combined Modality Therapy
Humans
Lung Neoplasms/*therapy
Pubmed
Web of science
Create date
24/01/2008 17:12
Last modification date
20/08/2019 14:15