Minimal Microvascular Resistance: Agreement Between Continuous and Bolus Thermodilution.
Details
Serval ID
serval:BIB_5C0740D10ADF
Type
Article: article from journal or magazin.
Collection
Publications
Institution
Title
Minimal Microvascular Resistance: Agreement Between Continuous and Bolus Thermodilution.
Journal
Catheterization and cardiovascular interventions
ISSN
1522-726X (Electronic)
ISSN-L
1522-1946
Publication state
In Press
Peer-reviewed
Oui
Language
english
Notes
Publication types: Journal Article
Publication Status: aheadofprint
Publication Status: aheadofprint
Abstract
Continuous thermodilution quantifies absolute microvascular resistance (R <sub>μ</sub> , Wood units), a key metric of microvascular function. R <sub>μ</sub> is minimal during hyperemia (R <sub>μ,hyper</sub> ) with increased R <sub>μ,hyper</sub> suggestive of microvascular dysfunction. Bolus thermodilution measures the index of microcirculatory resistance (IMR), a dimensionless surrogate of R <sub>μ,hyper</sub> .
We compared R <sub>μ,hyper</sub> measured by continuous thermodilution (invasive R <sub>μ,hyper</sub> ) with the gold standard [ <sup>15</sup> O]H <sub>2</sub> O positron emission tomography (PET R <sub>μ,hyper</sub> ), and assessed the correlation between invasive R <sub>μ,hyper</sub> and IMR.
First, the accuracy of invasive R <sub>μ,hyper</sub> was assessed in a cohort of 24 patients in which both invasive R <sub>μ,hyper</sub> and PET R <sub>μ,hyper</sub> were measured in the left anterior descending (LAD) and circumflex (LCX) arteries, corresponding to 46 measurements of R <sub>μ,hyper</sub> in total (LAD = 24, LCX = 22). Next, agreement between invasive R <sub>μ,hyper</sub> and IMR was evaluated in the LAD in a cohort of 250 patients with angina and non-obstructive coronary arteries.
Invasive R <sub>μ,hyper</sub> exhibited a strong correlation with PET R <sub>μ,hyper</sub> (r = 0.86 [95% CI 0.76-0.92], p < 0.001), with good absolute agreement (ICC 0.82 [95% CI 0.70-0.90], p < 0.001). Passing-Bablok regression analysis found no significant systematic (intercept A: 54.53 [95% CI -18.95 to 120.96]) or proportional (slope B: 0.90 [95% CI 0.71-1.15]) bias between invasive R <sub>μ,hyper</sub> and PET R <sub>μ,hyper</sub> . However, invasive R <sub>μ,hyper</sub> exhibited no significant correlation with IMR (r = 0.11 [95% CI -0.01 to 0.23], p = 0.08).
Invasive R <sub>μ,hyper</sub> derived from continuous thermodilution exhibited excellent agreement with noninvasive R <sub>μ,hyper</sub> measured by [ <sup>15</sup> O]H <sub>2</sub> O PET, the current non-invasive standard of reference. In contrast, IMR exhibited no significant correlation with invasive R <sub>μ,hyper</sub> in patients with angina and non-obstructive coronary arteries.
We compared R <sub>μ,hyper</sub> measured by continuous thermodilution (invasive R <sub>μ,hyper</sub> ) with the gold standard [ <sup>15</sup> O]H <sub>2</sub> O positron emission tomography (PET R <sub>μ,hyper</sub> ), and assessed the correlation between invasive R <sub>μ,hyper</sub> and IMR.
First, the accuracy of invasive R <sub>μ,hyper</sub> was assessed in a cohort of 24 patients in which both invasive R <sub>μ,hyper</sub> and PET R <sub>μ,hyper</sub> were measured in the left anterior descending (LAD) and circumflex (LCX) arteries, corresponding to 46 measurements of R <sub>μ,hyper</sub> in total (LAD = 24, LCX = 22). Next, agreement between invasive R <sub>μ,hyper</sub> and IMR was evaluated in the LAD in a cohort of 250 patients with angina and non-obstructive coronary arteries.
Invasive R <sub>μ,hyper</sub> exhibited a strong correlation with PET R <sub>μ,hyper</sub> (r = 0.86 [95% CI 0.76-0.92], p < 0.001), with good absolute agreement (ICC 0.82 [95% CI 0.70-0.90], p < 0.001). Passing-Bablok regression analysis found no significant systematic (intercept A: 54.53 [95% CI -18.95 to 120.96]) or proportional (slope B: 0.90 [95% CI 0.71-1.15]) bias between invasive R <sub>μ,hyper</sub> and PET R <sub>μ,hyper</sub> . However, invasive R <sub>μ,hyper</sub> exhibited no significant correlation with IMR (r = 0.11 [95% CI -0.01 to 0.23], p = 0.08).
Invasive R <sub>μ,hyper</sub> derived from continuous thermodilution exhibited excellent agreement with noninvasive R <sub>μ,hyper</sub> measured by [ <sup>15</sup> O]H <sub>2</sub> O PET, the current non-invasive standard of reference. In contrast, IMR exhibited no significant correlation with invasive R <sub>μ,hyper</sub> in patients with angina and non-obstructive coronary arteries.
Keywords
angina and nonobstructive coronary arteries, bolus thermodilution, continuous thermodilution, coronary microvascular dysfunction, minimal microvascular resistance
Pubmed
Web of science
Create date
16/04/2025 15:51
Last modification date
17/04/2025 7:10