Shoulder sensorimotor control assessment by force platform: feasibility and reliability.
Details
Serval ID
serval:BIB_56B2811F0150
Type
Article: article from journal or magazin.
Collection
Publications
Institution
Title
Shoulder sensorimotor control assessment by force platform: feasibility and reliability.
Journal
Clinical Physiology and Functional Imaging
ISSN
1475-097X (Electronic)
ISSN-L
1475-0961
Publication state
Published
Issued date
2012
Peer-reviewed
Oui
Volume
32
Number
5
Pages
409-413
Language
english
Notes
Publication types: Journal Article Publication Status: ppublish
Short Communication
Short Communication
Abstract
Given the important role of the shoulder sensorimotor system in shoulder stability, its assessment appears of interest. Force platform monitoring of centre of pressure (CoP) in upper-limb weight-bearing positions is of interest as it allows integration of all aspects of shoulder sensorimotor control. This study aimed to determine the feasibility and reliability of shoulder sensorimotor control assessment by force platform. Forty-five healthy subjects performed two sessions of CoP measurement using Win-Posturo(®) Medicapteurs force platform in an upper-limb weight-bearing position with the lower limbs resting on a table to either the anterior superior iliac spines (P1) or upper patellar poles (P2). Four different conditions were tested in each position in random order: eyes open or eyes closed with trunk supported by both hands and eyes open with trunk supported on the dominant or non-dominant side. P1 reliability values were globally moderate to high for CoP length, CoP velocity and CoP standard deviation (SD), standard error of measurement ranged from 6·0% to 26·5%, except for CoP area. P2 reliability values were globally low and not clinically acceptable. Our results suggest that shoulder sensorimotor control assessment by force platform is feasible and has good reliability in upper-limb weight-bearing positions when the lower limbs are resting on a table to the anterior superior iliac spines. CoP length, CoP velocity and CoP SD velocity appear to be the most reliable variables.
Pubmed
Web of science
Create date
17/09/2012 14:23
Last modification date
05/09/2024 9:01