Etude du biais du aux non-repondants dans une etude epidemiologique (SAPALDIA). [Bias due to non-responders in an epidemiological study (SAPALDIA)]
Details
Serval ID
serval:BIB_535F47874AA9
Type
Article: article from journal or magazin.
Collection
Publications
Institution
Title
Etude du biais du aux non-repondants dans une etude epidemiologique (SAPALDIA). [Bias due to non-responders in an epidemiological study (SAPALDIA)]
Journal
Sozial- und Praventivmedizin
ISSN
0303-8408 (Print)
Publication state
Published
Issued date
1997
Volume
42
Number
2
Pages
85-94
Notes
English Abstract
Journal Article
Multicenter Study
Journal Article
Multicenter Study
Abstract
Within the Swiss Study on Air Pollution and Lung Diseases in Adults (SAPALDIA) 16267 adults aged 18 to 60 years from 8 different locations in Switzerland were randomly selected for answering a questionnaire about respiratory health and have a lung function examination with allergy test. 9561 subjects agreed with the examination (59%) (= responders, R). In order to study the possible influence of the bias introduced by non-responders (NR), 221 subjects who refused to participate among the 966 first subjects selected in Payerne were contacted by phone. 142 accepted a home visit and answered a shortened questionnaire about the main respiratory symptoms and diseases and indicated furthermore the reasons for their refusal. Non-responders have a lower mean educational level and belong to lower social classes than responders. The frequency of respiratory symptoms and diseases, allergies and smoking is similar in R and NR except a higher frequency of wheezing during the last 12 month (R: 12.5%, NR: 5.6%, p = 0.03). The level of carbon monoxide in expired air is higher in NR (17.6 ppm) that in R (11.9 ppm) (p = 0.01). A similar difference exists between NR (30.7 pp) and R (24.8 ppm) among current smokers (p < 0.01). The main reasons for refusal are lack of time (27.5%), lack of interest for medical study (22.6%), fear of health professionals (18.3%) or the existence of a another disease (9.9%). Furthermore, 2.8% of the subjects consider a medical study as useless and refuse principally any participation. The role of local press and media in the decision to participate seems to be important. Globally, the differences between R and NR are minimal and should not influence the validity of the results of the SAPALDIA study.
Keywords
Adult
*Bias (Epidemiology)
Carbon Monoxide/analysis
Consumer Participation
*Cooperative Behavior
Cross-Sectional Studies
Educational Status
*Epidemiologic Methods
Female
Humans
Male
Mass Media
Middle Aged
Sampling Studies
Social Class
Pubmed
Web of science
Create date
25/01/2008 9:50
Last modification date
20/08/2019 14:08