Duration of antimicrobial treatment for uncomplicated streptococcal bacteraemia: Another example of shorter is better.
Details
Serval ID
serval:BIB_52973F9DBA1A
Type
Article: article from journal or magazin.
Collection
Publications
Institution
Title
Duration of antimicrobial treatment for uncomplicated streptococcal bacteraemia: Another example of shorter is better.
Journal
The Journal of infection
ISSN
1532-2742 (Electronic)
ISSN-L
0163-4453
Publication state
In Press
Peer-reviewed
Oui
Language
english
Notes
Publication types: Journal Article
Publication Status: aheadofprint
Publication Status: aheadofprint
Abstract
Duration of treatment for uncomplicated streptococcal bacteraemia is unknown. The study aims to assess clinical outcomes of patients with uncomplicated streptococcal bacteraemia receiving a short course (5-10 days) of antimicrobial treatment compared to those receiving the traditional, longer duration (11-18 days).
This retrospective study was conducted at the Lausanne University Hospital, Switzerland and included episodes of uncomplicated streptococcal bacteraemia among adult patients from 2015 to 2023. Clinical failure was defined as mortality, recurrence of bacteraemia by the same streptococcal species and development in bone and joint infection within 120 days.
During the study period, 336 episodes of uncomplicated streptococcal bacteraemia were included. The median duration of antimicrobial treatment was 10 days (interquartile range: 7-14); 184 (55%) and 152 (45%) episodes received a short (5-10 days) and long (11-18 days) duration of antimicrobial treatment, respectively. Forty-three (13%) episodes had clinical failure; 120-day mortality was 11% (36 episodes); recurrence of bacteraemia by the same streptococcal species was observed in 8 episodes (2%). No difference in clinical failure was observed between episodes receiving short and long courses of antimicrobial treatment (10% versus 16%; P 0.143). The Cox multivariable regression model found that a Charlson comorbidity index >4 (aHR 4.87, 95% CI 3.08-7.71), and septic shock (1.67, 1.04-2.67) were associated with clinical failure; a short course of antimicrobial treatment was not associated with clinical failure (0.90, 0.57-1.12).
This study has shown that a short duration of antimicrobial treatment for cases of streptococcal bacteraemia is effective and safe.
This retrospective study was conducted at the Lausanne University Hospital, Switzerland and included episodes of uncomplicated streptococcal bacteraemia among adult patients from 2015 to 2023. Clinical failure was defined as mortality, recurrence of bacteraemia by the same streptococcal species and development in bone and joint infection within 120 days.
During the study period, 336 episodes of uncomplicated streptococcal bacteraemia were included. The median duration of antimicrobial treatment was 10 days (interquartile range: 7-14); 184 (55%) and 152 (45%) episodes received a short (5-10 days) and long (11-18 days) duration of antimicrobial treatment, respectively. Forty-three (13%) episodes had clinical failure; 120-day mortality was 11% (36 episodes); recurrence of bacteraemia by the same streptococcal species was observed in 8 episodes (2%). No difference in clinical failure was observed between episodes receiving short and long courses of antimicrobial treatment (10% versus 16%; P 0.143). The Cox multivariable regression model found that a Charlson comorbidity index >4 (aHR 4.87, 95% CI 3.08-7.71), and septic shock (1.67, 1.04-2.67) were associated with clinical failure; a short course of antimicrobial treatment was not associated with clinical failure (0.90, 0.57-1.12).
This study has shown that a short duration of antimicrobial treatment for cases of streptococcal bacteraemia is effective and safe.
Keywords
Duration of antimicrobial treatment, Sepsis, Shorter is better, Streptococci, Uncomplicated bacteraemia
Pubmed
Open Access
Yes
Create date
25/10/2024 13:38
Last modification date
26/10/2024 6:12