La fragilité : un concept robuste mais une méthode d'évaluation encore fragile [Frailty: A robust concept with a still frail assessment method]
Details
Serval ID
serval:BIB_520236F5765C
Type
Article: article from journal or magazin.
Publication sub-type
Review (review): journal as complete as possible of one specific subject, written based on exhaustive analyses from published work.
Collection
Publications
Institution
Title
La fragilité : un concept robuste mais une méthode d'évaluation encore fragile [Frailty: A robust concept with a still frail assessment method]
Journal
Neurologie - Psychiatrie - Gériatrie
ISSN
1627-4830
ISSN-L
1627-4830
Publication state
Published
Issued date
2014
Peer-reviewed
Oui
Volume
14
Number
79
Pages
43-9
Language
french
Abstract
Si les efforts de recherche ont conduit à mieux préciser la physiopathologie et la dynamique du processus de fragilisation, la définition opérationnelle de la fragilité est encore loin d'être univoque. L'objectif de cet article est, à partir de deux situations cliniques concrètes, d'apporter notre réflexion sur la pertinence des indicateurs opérationnels actuels.
Even though the efforts in research have detailed further the physiopathology and the dynamics of the frailty process an operational definition of frailty is still far from being unequivocal. The aim of this article is, based upon two concrete clinical cases, to discuss the relevance of the current operational indicators of frailty.
Even though the efforts in research have detailed further the physiopathology and the dynamics of the frailty process an operational definition of frailty is still far from being unequivocal. The aim of this article is, based upon two concrete clinical cases, to discuss the relevance of the current operational indicators of frailty.
Create date
15/04/2015 10:01
Last modification date
20/08/2019 15:07
Usage data
