Differential prognostic impact of resting heart rate in older compared with younger patients with chronic heart failure--insights from TIME-CHF.

Details

Serval ID
serval:BIB_50F61C17A6D2
Type
Article: article from journal or magazin.
Collection
Publications
Title
Differential prognostic impact of resting heart rate in older compared with younger patients with chronic heart failure--insights from TIME-CHF.
Journal
Journal of cardiac failure
Author(s)
Zurek M., Maeder M.T., Rickli H., Muzzarelli S., Sanders-van Wijk S., Abbühl H., Handschin R., Jeker U., Pfisterer M., Brunner-la Rocca H.P.
Working group(s)
TIME-CHF Investigators
ISSN
1532-8414 (Electronic)
ISSN-L
1071-9164
Publication state
Published
Issued date
04/2015
Peer-reviewed
Oui
Volume
21
Number
4
Pages
347-354
Language
english
Notes
Publication types: Comparative Study ; Journal Article ; Multicenter Study ; Randomized Controlled Trial ; Research Support, Non-U.S. Gov't
Publication Status: ppublish
Abstract
There is little information regarding the prognostic role of resting heart rate (HR) in older compared with younger patients with chronic heart failure (HF).
In patients enrolled in the Trial of Intensified Medical Therapy in Elderly Patients With Congestive Heart Failure (TIME-CHF) with sinus rhythm, effects of baseline HR (≥70 vs <70 beats/min [bpm]) on 18-month outcomes were compared between older (≥75 years; n = 186) and younger (<75 years; n = 141) patients. Older patients with lower (61 ± 6 bpm) and higher (83 ± 9 bpm) HR had similar left ventricular ejection fraction (LVEF), New York Heart Association (NYHA) functional class, N-terminal pro-B-type natriuretic peptide (NT-proBNP), and survival and HF hospitalization-free survival. In contrast, younger patients with higher HR (81 ± 7 bpm) had higher NT-proBNP and NYHA functional class, lower LVEF, and a higher risk of death (hazard ratio 4.01 [95% confidence interval (CI) 1.17 -13.69]; P = .02) and death or HF hospitalization (hazard ratio 2.35 [95% CI 1.01-5.50]; P = .04) than those with lower HR (62 ± 5 bpm), with the association between higher HR and survival remaining significant after adjustment for NYHA functional class, LVEF, and NT-proBNP.
In contrast to HF patients aged <75 years, we found no association between HR and worse outcomes in HF patients aged ≥75 years.
Keywords
Age Factors, Aged, Aged, 80 and over, Female, Heart Failure/physiopathology, Heart Rate/physiology, Humans, Male, Prognosis, Rest/physiology, Stroke Volume/physiology, Ventricular Function, Left/physiology, Heart rate, TIME-CHF, age, chronic heart failure, prognosis
Pubmed
Web of science
Create date
15/11/2017 15:56
Last modification date
23/02/2024 13:58
Usage data