Dual energy computed tomography cannot effectively differentiate between calcium pyrophosphate and basic calcium phosphate diseases in the clinical setting.

Details

Ressource 1Download: 38384979_BIB_4FA4FE5A2AF9.pdf (971.61 [Ko])
State: Public
Version: Final published version
License: CC BY-NC-ND 4.0
Serval ID
serval:BIB_4FA4FE5A2AF9
Type
Article: article from journal or magazin.
Collection
Publications
Institution
Title
Dual energy computed tomography cannot effectively differentiate between calcium pyrophosphate and basic calcium phosphate diseases in the clinical setting.
Journal
Osteoarthritis and cartilage open
Author(s)
Jarraya M., Bitoun O., Wu D., Balza R., Guermazi A., Collins J., Gupta R., Nielsen G.P., Guermazi E., Simeone F.J., Omoumi P., Melnic C.M., Yee S.
ISSN
2665-9131 (Electronic)
ISSN-L
2665-9131
Publication state
Published
Issued date
03/2024
Peer-reviewed
Oui
Volume
6
Number
1
Pages
100436
Language
english
Notes
Publication types: Journal Article
Publication Status: epublish
Abstract
Recent reports suggested that dual-energy CT (DECT) may help discriminate between different types of calcium phosphate crystals in vivo, which would have important implications for the characterization of crystal deposition occurring in osteoarthritis.
Our aim was to test the hypothesis that DECT can effectively differentiate basic calcium phosphate (BCP) from calcium pyrophosphate (CPP) deposition diseases.
Discarded tissue after total knee replacement specimens in a 71 year-old patient with knee osteoarthritis and chondrocalcinosis was scanned using DECT at standard clinical parameters. Specimens were then examined on light microscopy which revealed CPP deposition in 4 specimens (medial femoral condyle, lateral tibial plateau and both menisci) without BCP deposition. Regions of interest were placed on post-processed CT images using Rho/Z maps (Syngo.via, Siemens Healthineers, VB10B) in different areas of CPP deposition, trabecular bone BCP (T-BCP) and subchondral bone plate BCP (C-BCP).
Dual Energy Index (DEI) of CPP was 0.12 (SD ​= ​0.02) for reader 1 and 0.09 (SD ​= ​0.03) for reader 2, The effective atomic number (Z <sub>eff</sub> ) of CPP was 10.83 (SD ​= ​0.44) for reader 1 and 10.11 (SD ​= ​0.66) for reader 2. Nearly all DECT parameters of CPP were higher than those of T-BCP, lower than those of C-BCP, and largely overlapping with Aggregate-BCP (aggregate of T-BCP and C-BCP).
Differentiation of different types of calcium crystals using DECT is not feasible in a clinical setting.
Keywords
CT, Calcium phosphate, Crystal, Dual energy, Osteoarthritis
Pubmed
Web of science
Open Access
Yes
Create date
26/02/2024 13:29
Last modification date
20/08/2024 6:22
Usage data