The impact of mpMRI-targeted vs systematic biopsy on the risk of prostate cancer downgrading at final pathology.
Details
Serval ID
serval:BIB_47A3EF869A92
Type
Article: article from journal or magazin.
Collection
Publications
Institution
Title
The impact of mpMRI-targeted vs systematic biopsy on the risk of prostate cancer downgrading at final pathology.
Journal
World journal of urology
ISSN
1433-8726 (Electronic)
ISSN-L
0724-4983
Publication state
Published
Issued date
22/04/2024
Peer-reviewed
Oui
Volume
42
Number
1
Pages
248
Language
english
Notes
Publication types: Journal Article ; Comparative Study
Publication Status: epublish
Publication Status: epublish
Abstract
Although targeted biopsies (TBx) are associated with improved disease assessment, concerns have been raised regarding the risk of prostate cancer (PCa) overgrading due to more accurate biopsy core deployment in the index lesion.
We identified 1672 patients treated with radical prostatectomy (RP) with a positive mpMRI and ISUP ≥ 2 PCa detected via systematic biopsy (SBx) plus TBx. We compared downgrading rates at RP (ISUP 4-5, 3, and 2 at biopsy, to a lower ISUP) for PCa detected via SBx only (group 1), via TBx only (group 2), and eventually for PCa detected with the same ISUP 2-5 at both SBx and TBx (group 3), using multivariable logistic regression models (MVA).
Overall, 12 vs 14 vs 6% (n = 176 vs 227 vs 96) downgrading rates were recorded in group 1 vs group 2 vs group 3, respectively (p < 0.001). At MVA, group 2 was more likely to be downgraded (OR 1.26, p = 0.04), as compared to group 1. Conversely, group 3 was less likely to be downgraded at RP (OR 0.42, p < 0.001).
Downgrading rates are highest when PCa is present in TBx only and, especially when the highest grade PCa is diagnosed by TBx cores only. Conversely, downgrading rates are lowest when PCa is identified with the same ISUP through both SBx and TBx. The presence of clinically significant disease at SBx + TBx may indicate a more reliable assessment of the disease at the time of biopsy potentially reducing the risk of downgrading at final pathology.
We identified 1672 patients treated with radical prostatectomy (RP) with a positive mpMRI and ISUP ≥ 2 PCa detected via systematic biopsy (SBx) plus TBx. We compared downgrading rates at RP (ISUP 4-5, 3, and 2 at biopsy, to a lower ISUP) for PCa detected via SBx only (group 1), via TBx only (group 2), and eventually for PCa detected with the same ISUP 2-5 at both SBx and TBx (group 3), using multivariable logistic regression models (MVA).
Overall, 12 vs 14 vs 6% (n = 176 vs 227 vs 96) downgrading rates were recorded in group 1 vs group 2 vs group 3, respectively (p < 0.001). At MVA, group 2 was more likely to be downgraded (OR 1.26, p = 0.04), as compared to group 1. Conversely, group 3 was less likely to be downgraded at RP (OR 0.42, p < 0.001).
Downgrading rates are highest when PCa is present in TBx only and, especially when the highest grade PCa is diagnosed by TBx cores only. Conversely, downgrading rates are lowest when PCa is identified with the same ISUP through both SBx and TBx. The presence of clinically significant disease at SBx + TBx may indicate a more reliable assessment of the disease at the time of biopsy potentially reducing the risk of downgrading at final pathology.
Keywords
Humans, Prostatic Neoplasms/pathology, Prostatic Neoplasms/surgery, Male, Middle Aged, Aged, Multiparametric Magnetic Resonance Imaging, Image-Guided Biopsy/methods, Neoplasm Grading, Prostatectomy/methods, Retrospective Studies, Risk Assessment, Prostate/pathology, Biopsy/methods, Radical prostatectomy, Systematic biopsy, Targeted biopsy, mpMRI
Pubmed
Web of science
Create date
29/04/2024 9:31
Last modification date
04/05/2024 6:06