Utility of the surface electrocardiogram for confirming right ventricular septal pacing: validation using electroanatomical mapping.

Details

Serval ID
serval:BIB_423681CC8A4F
Type
Article: article from journal or magazin.
Collection
Publications
Title
Utility of the surface electrocardiogram for confirming right ventricular septal pacing: validation using electroanatomical mapping.
Journal
Europace
Author(s)
Burri H., Park C.I., Zimmermann M., Gentil-Baron P., Stettler C., Sunthorn H., Domenichini G., Shah D.
ISSN
1532-2092 (Electronic)
ISSN-L
1099-5129
Publication state
Published
Issued date
01/2011
Peer-reviewed
Oui
Volume
13
Number
1
Pages
82-86
Language
english
Notes
Publication types: Journal Article ; Multicenter Study ; Research Support, Non-U.S. Gov't ; Validation Study
Publication Status: ppublish
Abstract
When targeting the interventricular septum during pacemaker implantation, the lead may inadvertently be positioned on the anterior wall due to imprecise fluoroscopic landmarks. Surface electrocardiogram (ECG) criteria of the paced QRS complex (e.g. negativity in lead I) have been proposed to confirm a septal position, but these criteria have not been properly validated. Our aim was to investigate whether the paced QRS complex may be used to confirm septal lead position.
Anatomical reconstruction of the right ventricle was performed using a NavX® system in 31 patients (70 ± 11 years, 26 males) to validate pacing sites. Surface 12-lead ECGs were analysed by digital callipers and compared while pacing from a para-Hissian position, from the mid-septum, and from the anterior free wall.
Duration of the QRS complex was not significantly shorter when pacing from the mid-septum compared with the other sites. QRS axis was significantly less vertical during mid-septal pacing (18 ± 51°) compared with para-Hissian (38 ± 37°, P = 0.028) and anterior (53 ± 55°, P = 0.003) pacing, and QRS transition was intermediate (4.8 ± 1.3 vs. 3.8 ± 1.3, P < 0.001, and vs. 5.4 ± 0.9, P = 0.045, respectively), although no cut-offs could reliably distinguish sites. A negative QRS or the presence of a q-wave in lead I tended to be more frequent with anterior than with mid-septal pacing (9/31 vs. 3/31, P = 0.2 and 8/31 vs. 1/31, P = 1.0, respectively).
No single ECG criterion could reliably distinguish pacing the mid-septum from the anterior wall. In particular, a negative QRS complex in lead I is an inaccurate criterion for validating septal pacing.
Keywords
Aged, Aged, 80 and over, Body Surface Potential Mapping/methods, Cardiomyopathy, Dilated/pathology, Cardiomyopathy, Dilated/physiopathology, Electrocardiography, Female, Heart Conduction System/pathology, Heart Conduction System/physiopathology, Heart Diseases/pathology, Heart Diseases/physiopathology, Heart Valve Diseases/pathology, Heart Valve Diseases/physiopathology, Heart Ventricles/pathology, Heart Ventricles/physiopathology, Humans, Male, Middle Aged, Myocardial Ischemia/pathology, Myocardial Ischemia/physiopathology, Prospective Studies, Ventricular Septum/pathology, Ventricular Septum/physiopathology
Pubmed
Web of science
Open Access
Yes
Create date
03/03/2024 18:06
Last modification date
11/03/2024 7:17
Usage data