Primary care physicians' attitude and reported prescribing behavior for chronic low back pain: An exploratory cross-sectional study.

Details

Ressource 1Download: BIB_3EB754A1D118.pdf (1806.89 [Ko])
State: Public
Version: Final published version
License: CC BY 4.0
Serval ID
serval:BIB_3EB754A1D118
Type
Article: article from journal or magazin.
Collection
Publications
Institution
Title
Primary care physicians' attitude and reported prescribing behavior for chronic low back pain: An exploratory cross-sectional study.
Journal
PloS one
Author(s)
Rodondi P.Y., Dubois J., Bill A.S., Koutaïssoff D., Ros J., Aveni E., Pasquier J., Herzig L., Decosterd I., Burnand B.
ISSN
1932-6203 (Electronic)
ISSN-L
1932-6203
Publication state
Published
Issued date
2018
Peer-reviewed
Oui
Volume
13
Number
9
Pages
e0204613
Language
english
Notes
Publication types: Journal Article ; Research Support, Non-U.S. Gov't
Publication Status: epublish
Abstract
Recent guidelines for chronic or recurrent low back pain recommend non-pharmacologic treatments as first-line options. The objective of this study was thus to explore the perceived usefulness of several conventional and complementary medicine treatments for chronic or recurrent low back pain by primary care physicians and their reported prescribing behavior.
An exploratory cross-sectional study.
Primary care physicians of the French-speaking part of Switzerland.
Primary care physicians' perceived usefulness of each conventional and complementary medicine treatment and their reported recommendation behavior were considered dependent variables in multivariate logistic regression models. All correlations were computed between binary variables, and phi coefficients were calculated to estimate correlation strengths.
533 primary care physicians answered the questionnaire (response rate: 25.6%). The top 3 conventional treatments most often considered useful by primary care physicians for chronic or recurrent low back pain were physiotherapy (94.8%), nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory drugs (87.9%), and manual therapy (82.5%), whereas the most prescribed conventional treatments were physiotherapy (99.2%), nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory drugs (97.4%), and acetaminophen (94.4%). Osteopathic treatment (78.4%), yoga (69.3%), and therapeutic massage (63.9%) were the complementary medicine treatments most often considered useful by primary care physicians in managing chronic or recurrent low back pain. Being a female physician, younger than 56 years, trained in complementary medicine, or using complementary medicine were all associated with higher perceived usefulness of complementary medicine treatments in general. The most recommended complementary medicine treatments by primary care physicians were osteopathic treatment (87.3%), acupuncture (69.3%), and therapeutic massage (58.7%). Being a female physician, younger than 56, and using complementary medicine were all associated with more complementary medicine recommendation in general.
Our results highlight the importance of better understanding the prescribing patterns of primary care physicians for chronic or recurrent low back pain. Considering the frequency and burden of chronic or recurrent low back pain, programs focusing on the most (cost-) effective treatments should be implemented.
Keywords
Acupuncture Therapy, Attitude of Health Personnel, Chronic Pain/therapy, Complementary Therapies, Cross-Sectional Studies, Female, Humans, Low Back Pain/drug therapy, Low Back Pain/therapy, Male, Manipulation, Chiropractic, Manipulation, Osteopathic, Middle Aged, Physical Therapy Modalities, Physicians, Primary Care, Practice Patterns, Physicians', Surveys and Questionnaires, Switzerland
Pubmed
Web of science
Open Access
Yes
Create date
22/10/2018 18:23
Last modification date
20/08/2019 14:35
Usage data