Systematic method for developing tailored strategies for implementing point-of-care procalcitonin testing to guide antibiotic prescribing in Swiss primary care: a protocol for a mixed-methods participatory approach.

Details

Serval ID
serval:BIB_3AD58F3BECBF
Type
Article: article from journal or magazin.
Publication sub-type
Review (review): journal as complete as possible of one specific subject, written based on exhaustive analyses from published work.
Collection
Publications
Institution
Title
Systematic method for developing tailored strategies for implementing point-of-care procalcitonin testing to guide antibiotic prescribing in Swiss primary care: a protocol for a mixed-methods participatory approach.
Journal
BMJ open
Author(s)
Wolfensberger A., Gendolla S.C., Dunaiceva J., Plüss-Suard C., Niquille A., Nicolet A., Marti J., Powell B.J., Naef R., Boillat-Blanco N., Mueller Y., Clack L.
ISSN
2044-6055 (Electronic)
ISSN-L
2044-6055
Publication state
Published
Issued date
05/03/2025
Peer-reviewed
Oui
Volume
15
Number
3
Pages
e091285
Language
english
Notes
Publication types: Journal Article
Publication Status: epublish
Abstract
Antimicrobial resistance is a major global health threat, driven largely by the misuse and overuse of antibiotics. Point-of-care (POC) tests for inflammatory biomarkers like procalcitonin (PCT) have shown promise in reducing unnecessary antibiotic prescriptions. The hybrid type II ImpPro trial aims to evaluate the implementation and effectiveness of POC-PCT on antibiotic prescriptions by primary care physicians (PCP) in French-speaking Switzerland. Implementation is planned to include a multifaceted strategy delivered mainly, but not exclusively, via PCP quality circles. Currently, little guidance exists on how to best tailor the implementation strategies to a specific context. This study protocol describes the comprehensive approach taken within ImpPro to develop a multifaceted and multilevel strategy for POC-PCT implementation.
Our mixed-methods participatory implementation research study consists of four phases: (1) determinant identification; (2) determinant prioritisation; (3) implementation strategy ideation and (4) implementation strategy selection and refinement. All phases of the study will be guided by well-established implementation theories, models and frameworks. For 1, to identify the possible barriers and facilitators for implementation, we will conduct semistructured interviews with stakeholders followed by deductive coding using the updated Consolidated Framework for Implementation Research and inductive thematic analysis. In 2, to identify the key determinants, we will conduct online focus group discussions and vote on the importance and changeability of determinants. In 3, we will conduct interviews and an expert brainstorming session, followed by deductively coding implementation ideas according to the Expert Recommendations for Implementing Change compilation. In 4, we will conduct focus group discussions with experts and stakeholders about the APEASE criteria (ie, affordability, practicability, (cost-)effectiveness, acceptability, side effects and safety and equity) of these strategies, followed by a rapid data analysis approach to select the implementation strategies.
This study does not fall within the scope of the Human Research Act, and the necessity for a formal evaluation was waived from the Cantonal Ethics Committee (Req-2023-00392). The results of our study will be shared among the Antimicrobial Stewardship in Ambulatory Care Platform network, published in peer-reviewed scientific journals, and will be presented at international and national conferences.
Keywords
Humans, Switzerland, Primary Health Care, Anti-Bacterial Agents/therapeutic use, Procalcitonin/blood, Point-of-Care Testing, Practice Patterns, Physicians', Antimicrobial Stewardship/methods, Research Design, Implementation Science, Primary Care, Protocols & guidelines
Pubmed
Web of science
Open Access
Yes
Create date
10/03/2025 10:22
Last modification date
22/03/2025 7:06
Usage data