Diagnostic performance of angiography-derived fractional flow reserve in patients with NSTEMI.

Details

Serval ID
serval:BIB_34DD514716DC
Type
Article: article from journal or magazin.
Collection
Publications
Institution
Title
Diagnostic performance of angiography-derived fractional flow reserve in patients with NSTEMI.
Journal
Catheterization and cardiovascular interventions
Author(s)
Skalidis I., Meier D., De Bruyne B., Collet C., Sonck J., Mahendiran T., Rotzinger D., Qanadli S.D., Eeckhout E., Muller O., Fournier S.
ISSN
1522-726X (Electronic)
ISSN-L
1522-1946
Publication state
Published
Issued date
28/12/2022
Peer-reviewed
Oui
Volume
101
Number
2
Pages
308-315
Language
english
Abstract
Noninvasive methods of estimating invasively measured fractional flow reserve (FFR <sub>invasive</sub> ) are actively being explored, aiming to avoid the use of an invasive pressure wire and the administration of hyperemia-inducing drugs. Coronary angiography-derived FFR (FFR <sub>angio</sub> ) has already demonstrated its diagnostic performance in the context of stable coronary artery disease. However, its applicability in the context of non-ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction (NSTEMI) has yet to be established. We sought to determine the diagnostic performance of FFR <sub>angio</sub> exclusively in patients presenting with NSTEMI. We performed a prospective, single-center, single-arm, double-blinded study comparing FFR calculated by FFR <sub>angio</sub> to FFR <sub>invasive</sub> in NSTEMI patients. FFR <sub>invasive</sub> was measured in all angiographically intermediate lesions (30%-70% stenosis) and was then compared to FFR <sub>angio</sub> which was calculated at the same position, by a blinded operator. The primary endpoints were the sensitivity and specificity of FFR <sub>angio</sub> for predicting FFR <sub>invasive</sub> using a cut-off value of ≤0.80. Among 100 NSTEMI patients who were screened, 46 patients with 60 vessels in total underwent FFR <sub>invasive</sub> and were included in the study. The mean value of FFR <sub>invasive</sub> was 0.83 ± 0.3 with 22 (36%) being ≤0.80 while the mean FFR <sub>angio</sub> was 0.82 ± 0.1 with 22 (36%) being ≤0.80. FFR <sub>angio</sub> exhibited a sensitivity of 95.5%, a specificity of 97.4%, and a diagnostic accuracy of 96.7%. FFR <sub>angio</sub> can precisely and noninvasively estimate FFR <sub>invasive</sub> in acute coronary syndromes and may have a role in guiding treatment decisions related to angiographically intermediate coronary lesions in this context.
FFR <sub>angio</sub> has demonstrated its diagnostic performance in validation studies, as a noninvasive and cost-effective method in the context of stable coronary artery disease but its performance has never been exclusively evaluated in NSTEMI patients.
The present prospective single-center study demonstrates the excellent diagnostic performance of FFR <sub>angio</sub> in detecting functionally significant coronary artery stenosis in the setting of NSTEMI, providing more confidence in utilizing FFR <sub>angio</sub> in this population, avoiding the risk of an invasive pressure wire and the administration of hyperemia-inducing drugs.
Future randomized trials evaluating FFR <sub>angio</sub> -guided treatment of coronary artery disease (stable or ACS) are now needed to definitively establish the role of FFR <sub>angio</sub> in the physiological assessment of coronary lesions.
Keywords
ACS, FFR, FFRangio, NSTEMI
Pubmed
Web of science
Create date
10/01/2023 15:44
Last modification date
16/04/2024 6:11
Usage data