Are there accurate predictors of long-term vital and functional outcomes in cardiac surgical patients requiring prolonged intensive care?

Details

Ressource 1Download: serval:BIB_34ADB65ABB03.P001 (130.52 [Ko])
State: Public
Version: author
License: Not specified
It was possible to publish this article open access thanks to a Swiss National Licence with the publisher.
Serval ID
serval:BIB_34ADB65ABB03
Type
Article: article from journal or magazin.
Collection
Publications
Institution
Title
Are there accurate predictors of long-term vital and functional outcomes in cardiac surgical patients requiring prolonged intensive care?
Journal
European Journal of Cardio-Thoracic Surgery
Author(s)
Gersbach  P., Tevaearai  H., Revelly  J. P., Bize  P., Chiolero  R., von Segesser  L. K.
ISSN
1010-7940 (Print)
Publication state
Published
Issued date
04/2006
Volume
29
Number
4
Pages
466-72
Notes
Journal Article --- Old month value: Apr
Abstract
BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVE: The decision to maintain intensive treatment in cardiac surgical patients with poor initial outcome is mostly based on individual experience. The risk scoring systems used in cardiac surgery have no prognostic value for individuals. This study aims to assess (a) factors possibly related to poor survival and functional outcomes in cardiac surgery patients requiring prolonged (> or = 5 days) intensive care unit (ICU) treatment, (b) conditions in which treatment withdrawal might be justified, and (c) the patient's perception of the benefits and drawbacks of long intensive treatments. METHODS: The computerized data prospectively recorded for every patient in the intensive care unit over a 3-year period were reviewed and analyzed (n=1859). Survival and quality of life (QOL) outcomes were determined in all patients having required > or =5 consecutive days of intensive treatment (n=194/10.4%). Long-term survivors were interviewed at yearly intervals in a standardized manner and quality of life was assessed using the dependency score of Karnofsky. No interventions or treatments were given, withhold, or withdrawn as part of this study. RESULTS: In-hospital, 1-, and 3-year cumulative survival rates reached 91.3%, 85.6%, and 75.1%, respectively. Quality of life assessed 1 year postoperatively by the score of Karnofsky was good in 119/165 patients, fair in 32 and poor in 14. Multivariate logistic regression analysis of 19 potential predictors of poor outcome identified dialysis as the sole factor significantly (p=0.027) - albeit moderately - reducing long-term survival, and sustained neurological deficit as an inconstant predictor of poor functional outcome (p=0.028). One year postoperatively 0.63% of patients still reminded of severe suffering in the intensive station and 20% of discomfort. Only 7.7% of patients would definitely refuse redo surgery. CONCLUSIONS: This study of cardiac surgical patients requiring > or =5 days of intensive treatment did not identify factors unequivocally justifying early treatment limitation in individuals. It found that 1-year mortality and disability rates can be maintained at a low level in this subset of patients, and that severe suffering in the ICU is infrequent.
Keywords
Adolescent Adult Age Factors Aged Attitude to Health *Cardiac Surgical Procedures/adverse effects Cause of Death Epidemiologic Methods Female Humans *Intensive Care Karnofsky Performance Status Length of Stay Male Middle Aged Patient Readmission Postoperative Care Postoperative Complications/therapy Prognosis Quality of Life Withholding Treatment
Pubmed
Web of science
Open Access
Yes
Create date
24/01/2008 18:03
Last modification date
25/09/2019 7:08
Usage data