More than 10 years of experience with immediate sequential bilateral cataract extraction (ISBCE) - a retrospective study
Details
Download: BIB_33501E95CC22.P001.pdf (2567.34 [Ko])
State: Public
Version: Final published version
State: Public
Version: Final published version
Serval ID
serval:BIB_33501E95CC22
Type
Article: article from journal or magazin.
Collection
Publications
Institution
Title
More than 10 years of experience with immediate sequential bilateral cataract extraction (ISBCE) - a retrospective study
Journal
Open J Ophthalmol
ISSN
2165-7408
ISSN-L
2165-7416
Publication state
Published
Issued date
2014
Peer-reviewed
Oui
Volume
4
Pages
139-144
Language
english
Abstract
Background: To evaluate the safety of immediate sequential bilateral cataract extraction (ISBCE)
with respect to indications, visual outcomes, complications, benefits and disadvantages. Methods:
This is a retrospective review of all ISBCEs performed at Kantonsspital Winterthur, Switzerland,
between April 2000 and September 2013. The case notes of 500 eyes of 250 patients were reviewed.
Of these 500 eyes, 472 (94.4%) had a straight forward phacoemulsification with posterior
chamber intraocular lens implantation; 21 (4.2%) had a planned extracapsular cataract extraction;
4 (0.8%) had an intracapsular cataract extraction and 3 (0.6%) had a combined phacoemulsification
with trabeculectomy. Results: Over 66% of eyes achieved improved visual acuity (at least 3
Snellen lines) following ISBCE. Median preoperative best corrected visual acuity (BCVA) was 0.5
LogMAR; the interquartile range was [0.4, 1] LogMAR. At one week control the median BCVA was
0.3 LogMAR, IQR [0.1, 0.5] LogMAR. At one month the median BCVA was 0.15 LogMAR, IQR [0.05,
0.3] (p < 0.01). There were no sight-threatening intraoperative or postoperative complications
observed. Conclusions: ISBCE is an effective and safe option with high degree of patient satisfaction.
The relative benefits of ISBCE should be balanced against the theoretically enhanced risks.
with respect to indications, visual outcomes, complications, benefits and disadvantages. Methods:
This is a retrospective review of all ISBCEs performed at Kantonsspital Winterthur, Switzerland,
between April 2000 and September 2013. The case notes of 500 eyes of 250 patients were reviewed.
Of these 500 eyes, 472 (94.4%) had a straight forward phacoemulsification with posterior
chamber intraocular lens implantation; 21 (4.2%) had a planned extracapsular cataract extraction;
4 (0.8%) had an intracapsular cataract extraction and 3 (0.6%) had a combined phacoemulsification
with trabeculectomy. Results: Over 66% of eyes achieved improved visual acuity (at least 3
Snellen lines) following ISBCE. Median preoperative best corrected visual acuity (BCVA) was 0.5
LogMAR; the interquartile range was [0.4, 1] LogMAR. At one week control the median BCVA was
0.3 LogMAR, IQR [0.1, 0.5] LogMAR. At one month the median BCVA was 0.15 LogMAR, IQR [0.05,
0.3] (p < 0.01). There were no sight-threatening intraoperative or postoperative complications
observed. Conclusions: ISBCE is an effective and safe option with high degree of patient satisfaction.
The relative benefits of ISBCE should be balanced against the theoretically enhanced risks.
Keywords
Cataract, Cataract Surgery, Immediate Sequential Bilateral Cataract Extraction
Open Access
Yes
Create date
25/08/2015 15:34
Last modification date
20/08/2019 13:19