Time to endoscopy for acute upper gastrointestinal bleeding: Results from a prospective multicentre trainee-led audit.
Details
Serval ID
serval:BIB_32CF51E15D26
Type
Article: article from journal or magazin.
Collection
Publications
Institution
Title
Time to endoscopy for acute upper gastrointestinal bleeding: Results from a prospective multicentre trainee-led audit.
Journal
United European gastroenterology journal
ISSN
2050-6406 (Print)
ISSN-L
2050-6406
Publication state
Published
Issued date
03/2019
Peer-reviewed
Oui
Volume
7
Number
2
Pages
199-209
Language
english
Notes
Publication types: Journal Article ; Multicenter Study ; Research Support, Non-U.S. Gov't
Publication Status: ppublish
Publication Status: ppublish
Abstract
Endoscopy within 24 h of admission (early endoscopy) is a quality standard in acute upper gastrointestinal bleeding (AUGIB). We aimed to audit time to endoscopy outcomes and identify factors affecting delayed endoscopy (>24 h of admission).
This prospective multicentre audit enrolled patients admitted with AUGIB who underwent inpatient endoscopy between November and December 2017. Analyses were performed to identify factors associated with delayed endoscopy, and to compare patient outcomes, including length of stay and mortality rates, between early and delayed endoscopy groups.
Across 348 patients from 20 centres, the median time to endoscopy was 21.2 h (IQR 12.0-35.7), comprising median admission to referral and referral to endoscopy times of 8.1 h (IQR 3.7-18.1) and 6.7 h (IQR 3.0-23.1), respectively. Early endoscopy was achieved in 58.9%, although this varied by centre (range: 31.0-87.5%, p = 0.002). On multivariable analysis, lower Glasgow-Blatchford score, delayed referral, admissions between 7:00 and 19:00 hours or via the emergency department were independent predictors of delayed endoscopy. Early endoscopy was associated with reduced length of stay (median difference 1 d; p = 0.004), but not 30-d mortality (p = 0.344).
The majority of centres did not meet national standards for time to endoscopy. Strategic initiatives involving acute care services may be necessary to improve this outcome.
This prospective multicentre audit enrolled patients admitted with AUGIB who underwent inpatient endoscopy between November and December 2017. Analyses were performed to identify factors associated with delayed endoscopy, and to compare patient outcomes, including length of stay and mortality rates, between early and delayed endoscopy groups.
Across 348 patients from 20 centres, the median time to endoscopy was 21.2 h (IQR 12.0-35.7), comprising median admission to referral and referral to endoscopy times of 8.1 h (IQR 3.7-18.1) and 6.7 h (IQR 3.0-23.1), respectively. Early endoscopy was achieved in 58.9%, although this varied by centre (range: 31.0-87.5%, p = 0.002). On multivariable analysis, lower Glasgow-Blatchford score, delayed referral, admissions between 7:00 and 19:00 hours or via the emergency department were independent predictors of delayed endoscopy. Early endoscopy was associated with reduced length of stay (median difference 1 d; p = 0.004), but not 30-d mortality (p = 0.344).
The majority of centres did not meet national standards for time to endoscopy. Strategic initiatives involving acute care services may be necessary to improve this outcome.
Keywords
Acute Disease, Aged, Aged, 80 and over, Delayed Diagnosis, Endoscopy, Digestive System/methods, Female, Gastrointestinal Hemorrhage/diagnosis, Gastrointestinal Hemorrhage/etiology, Hospitalization, Humans, Kaplan-Meier Estimate, Male, Middle Aged, Prognosis, Prospective Studies, Risk Factors, Time Factors, Upper gastrointestinal bleeding, endoscopy, haemorrhage, quality, time to endoscopy
Pubmed
Web of science
Open Access
Yes
Create date
27/06/2025 12:26
Last modification date
28/06/2025 7:03