Electromyographic reactivity measured with scalp-EEG contributes to prognostication after cardiac arrest.
Details
Serval ID
serval:BIB_2FA62FCAD45F
Type
Article: article from journal or magazin.
Collection
Publications
Institution
Title
Electromyographic reactivity measured with scalp-EEG contributes to prognostication after cardiac arrest.
Journal
Resuscitation
ISSN
1873-1570 (Electronic)
ISSN-L
0300-9572
Publication state
Published
Issued date
05/2019
Peer-reviewed
Oui
Volume
138
Pages
146-152
Language
english
Notes
Publication types: Journal Article ; Multicenter Study ; Research Support, Non-U.S. Gov't
Publication Status: ppublish
Publication Status: ppublish
Abstract
To assess whether stimulus-induced modifications of electromyographic activity observed on scalp EEG have a prognostic value in comatose patients after cardiac arrest.
184 adult patients from a multi-centric prospective register who underwent an early EEG after cardiac arrest were included. Auditory and somatosensory stimulation was performed during EEG-recording. EEG reactivity (EEG-R) and EMG reactivity (EMG-R) were retrospectively assessed visually by board-certified electroencephalographers, and compared with clinical outcome (cerebral performance category, CPC) at three months. A favorable functional outcome was defined as CPC 1-2, an unfavorable outcome as CPC 3-5.
Both EEG-R and EMG-R were predictors for good outcome (EEG-R accuracy 72% (95%-CI 66-79), sensitivity 86% (78-93), specificity 60% (50-69); EMG-R accuracy 65% (58-72), sensitivity 61% (51-75), specificity 69% (60-78)). When reactivity was defined as EEG-R and/or EMG-R, the accuracy was 73% (67-70), the sensitivity 94% (90-99), and the specificity 53% (43-63).
Taking EMG into account when assessing reactivity of EEG seems to reduce false negative predictions for identifying patients with favorable outcome after cardiac arrest.
184 adult patients from a multi-centric prospective register who underwent an early EEG after cardiac arrest were included. Auditory and somatosensory stimulation was performed during EEG-recording. EEG reactivity (EEG-R) and EMG reactivity (EMG-R) were retrospectively assessed visually by board-certified electroencephalographers, and compared with clinical outcome (cerebral performance category, CPC) at three months. A favorable functional outcome was defined as CPC 1-2, an unfavorable outcome as CPC 3-5.
Both EEG-R and EMG-R were predictors for good outcome (EEG-R accuracy 72% (95%-CI 66-79), sensitivity 86% (78-93), specificity 60% (50-69); EMG-R accuracy 65% (58-72), sensitivity 61% (51-75), specificity 69% (60-78)). When reactivity was defined as EEG-R and/or EMG-R, the accuracy was 73% (67-70), the sensitivity 94% (90-99), and the specificity 53% (43-63).
Taking EMG into account when assessing reactivity of EEG seems to reduce false negative predictions for identifying patients with favorable outcome after cardiac arrest.
Keywords
Aged, Cardiopulmonary Resuscitation/methods, Coma/diagnosis, Coma/etiology, Coma/physiopathology, Electroencephalography/methods, Electromyography/methods, Female, Follow-Up Studies, Heart Arrest/complications, Heart Arrest/therapy, Humans, Male, Middle Aged, Predictive Value of Tests, Prognosis, Prospective Studies, Scalp, Video Recording, Cardiac arrest, Coma, EEG, EMG, Prognostication, Reactivity
Pubmed
Web of science
Create date
10/04/2019 16:17
Last modification date
12/08/2020 5:22