EAN consensus statement for management of patients with neurological diseases during the COVID-19 pandemic.

Details

Ressource 1Download: Euro J of Neurology - 2020 - von Oertzen - EAN consensus statement for management of patients with neurological diseases.pdf (210.32 [Ko])
State: Public
Version: Final published version
License: CC BY-NC-ND 4.0
Serval ID
serval:BIB_2E20E82F0F09
Type
Article: article from journal or magazin.
Collection
Publications
Title
EAN consensus statement for management of patients with neurological diseases during the COVID-19 pandemic.
Journal
European journal of neurology
Author(s)
von Oertzen T.J., Macerollo A., Leone M.A., Beghi E., Crean M., Oztuk S., Bassetti C., Twardzik A., Bereczki D., Di Liberto G., Helbok R., Oreja-Guevara C., Pisani A., Sauerbier A., Sellner J., Soffietti R., Zedde M., Bianchi E., Bodini B., Cavallieri F., Campiglio L., Maia L.F., Priori A., Rakusa M., Taba P., Moro E., Jenkins T.M.
Working group(s)
EANcore COVID-19 task force
ISSN
1468-1331 (Electronic)
ISSN-L
1351-5101
Publication state
Published
Issued date
01/2021
Peer-reviewed
Oui
Volume
28
Number
1
Pages
7-14
Language
english
Notes
Publication types: Practice Guideline ; Journal Article ; Review
Publication Status: ppublish
Abstract
The recent SARS-CoV-2 pandemic has posed multiple challenges to the practice of clinical neurology including recognition of emerging neurological complications and management of coexistent neurological diseases. In a fast-evolving pandemic, evidence-based studies are lacking in many areas. This paper presents European Academy of Neurology (EAN) expert consensus statements to guide neurologists caring for patients with COVID-19.
A refined Delphi methodology was applied. In round 1, statements were provided by EAN scientific panels (SPs). In round 2, these statements were circulated to SP members not involved in writing them, asking for agreement/disagreement. Items with agreement >70% were retained for round 3, in which SP co-chairs rated importance on a five-point Likert scale. Results were graded by importance and reported as consensus statements.
In round one, 70 statements were provided by 23 SPs. In round two, 259/1061 SP member responses were received. Fifty-nine statements obtained >70% agreement and were retained. In round three, responses were received from 55 co-chairs of 29 SPs. Whilst general recommendations related to prevention of COVID-19 transmission had high levels of agreement and importance, opinion was more varied concerning statements related to therapy.
This is the first structured consensus statement on good clinical practice in patients with neurological disease during the COVID-19 pandemic that provides immediate guidance for neurologists. In this fast-evolving pandemic, a rapid response using refined Delphi methodology is possible, but guidance may be subject to change as further evidence emerges.
Keywords
COVID-19, Consensus, Delphi Technique, Guidelines as Topic, Humans, Nervous System Diseases/therapy, Neurology, Pandemics, Patient Care Management, chronic disease, human, neurology, practice guideline
Pubmed
Web of science
Open Access
Yes
Create date
28/05/2025 8:23
Last modification date
29/05/2025 7:20
Usage data