Current allergic asthma and rhinitis: diagnostic efficiency of three commonly used atopic markers (IgE, skin prick tests, and Phadiatop). Results from 8329 randomized adults from the SAPALDIA Study. Swiss Study on Air Pollution and Lung Diseases in Adults

Details

Serval ID
serval:BIB_2D841A09EB9F
Type
Article: article from journal or magazin.
Collection
Publications
Institution
Title
Current allergic asthma and rhinitis: diagnostic efficiency of three commonly used atopic markers (IgE, skin prick tests, and Phadiatop). Results from 8329 randomized adults from the SAPALDIA Study. Swiss Study on Air Pollution and Lung Diseases in Adults
Journal
Allergy
Author(s)
Tschopp  J. M., Sistek  D., Schindler  C., Leuenberger  P., Perruchoud  A. P., Wuthrich  B., Brutsche  M., Zellweger  J. P., Karrer  W., Brandli  O.
ISSN
0105-4538 (Print)
Publication state
Published
Issued date
06/1998
Volume
53
Number
6
Pages
608-13
Notes
Journal Article
Research Support, Non-U.S. Gov't --- Old month value: Jun
Abstract
Total serum IgE, Phadiatop, and the skin prick test (SPT) are commonly used to diagnose atopic diseases. However, no large study has ever been done to test their diagnostic efficiency. We studied the diagnostic value of these three atopic markers in 8329 well-randomized adults from the Swiss Population Registry. The prevalence of current allergic asthma (CAA) was 1.8% and of current allergic rhinitis (CAR) 16.3%. The prevalences of positive Phadiatop, positive SPT (at least, one out of eight SPT to common aeroallergens with a wheal of > or = 3 mm), and positive total IgE (IgE > or = 100 kU/l) were 29, 23, and 23%, respectively. To diagnose CAA and CAR, the sensitivity of Phadiatop was significantly higher than that of SPT (72.5% vs 65.4%, 77.1% vs 68.4% respectively; P < 0.01 and < 0.001) and IgE (72.5% vs 56.9%, 77.1% vs 43.9%, respectively; both P < 0.001). The sensitivity of SPT was significantly higher (68.4% vs 43.9% P < 0.001) than that of IgE to diagnose CAR. When CAA and CAR were excluded, the SPT specificity was significantly higher than that of Phadiatop (77.8% vs 71.9% and 85.9% vs 80.5%, respectively; both P < 0.001): when CAR was excluded, SPT was significantly higher than IgE (85.9 vs 81.4%; P < 0.001). SPT had significantly the best positive predictive value for CAA (5.2% for SPT vs 4.6% for both IgE and Phadiatop; both P < 0.001) and CAR (48.7% for SPT vs 43.5% for Phadiatop and 31.6% for IgE; both P < 0.001). The three markers of atopy had roughly the same negative predictive value (NPV) for CAA, but IgE had a significantly lower NPV for CAR than SPT and Phadiatop (88.1% vs 93.3% and 94.7%, respectively; both P < 0.001). The diagnostic efficiency of SPT was significantly higher than that of Phadiatop (83.1% vs 79.9% and 77.6 vs 71.9%, respectively; both P < 0.001) to diagnose CAR and CAA. IgE and SPT had equal efficiency (77.6%), which was significantly higher than that of Phadiatop, to diagnose CAA (71.9%; both P < 0.001). In conclusion, SPT have the best positive predictive value and the best efficiency to diagnose respiratory atopic diseases. Furthermore, SPT give information on sensitivity to individual allergens and should therefore be used primarily by clinicians to assess respiratory allergic diseases. Moreover, they are cheaper and provide immediate, educational information for both patient and physician.
Keywords
Adolescent Adult Asthma/*diagnosis/epidemiology Female Humans Immunoenzyme Techniques Immunoglobulin E/blood *Immunologic Tests Lung Diseases/epidemiology Male Middle Aged Predictive Value of Tests Rhinitis, Allergic, Seasonal/*diagnosis/epidemiology Sensitivity and Specificity Skin Tests Switzerland/epidemiology
Pubmed
Web of science
Create date
25/01/2008 9:50
Last modification date
20/08/2019 13:12
Usage data