Effects of cardiac resynchronization therapy on diastolic function: evaluation by radionuclide angiography.

Details

Serval ID
serval:BIB_2A881E04EE12
Type
Article: article from journal or magazin.
Collection
Publications
Title
Effects of cardiac resynchronization therapy on diastolic function: evaluation by radionuclide angiography.
Journal
Pacing and clinical electrophysiology
Author(s)
Boriani G., Valzania C., Fallani F., Biffi M., Martignani C., Saporito D., Ziacchi M., Diemberger I., Greco C., Bertini M., Domenichini G., Levorato M., Franchi R., Branzi A.
ISSN
0147-8389 (Print)
ISSN-L
0147-8389
Publication state
Published
Issued date
01/2007
Peer-reviewed
Oui
Volume
30 Suppl 1
Pages
S43-6
Language
english
Notes
Publication types: Clinical Trial ; Journal Article ; Research Support, Non-U.S. Gov't
Publication Status: ppublish
Abstract
While the beneficial effects of cardiac resynchronization therapy (CRT) on left ventricular (LV) systolic function have been demonstrated, no information is available regarding its effects on LV diastolic function during exercise. Using radionuclide angiography, we prospectively evaluated the effects of CRT on diastolic function at rest and during exercise in 15 patients consecutively referred for CRT. All patients underwent equilibrium Tc(99) radionuclide angiography with bicycle exercise performed (1) at baseline; (2) immediately after CRT implantation, in spontaneous rhythm and during CRT; and (3) after 3 months of biventricular stimulation. Diastolic function was assessed by measurements of peak filling rate (PFR). At baseline, activation of biventricular stimulation influenced PFR neither at rest (1.06 +/- 0.34 vs 1.07 +/- 0.50 mL/s during spontaneous rhythm, P = 0.9) nor during exercise (1.45 +/- 0.62 vs 1.33 +/- 0.48 mL/s, P = 0.3). At 3 months, improvements were observed in New York Heart Association functional class and systolic function. By contrast, no improvement in diastolic function was observed either at rest (PFR = 1.11 +/- 0.45 vs 1.07 +/- 0.50 mL/s in spontaneous rhythm at baseline, P = 0.6) or during exercise (1.23 +/- 0.50 vs 1.33 +/- 0.48 mL/s, P = 0.2). These observations indicate that the intermediate benefits conferred by CRT on LV systolic function at rest and during exercise were not accompanied by similar improvements in diastolic function.
Keywords
Aged, Cardiac Pacing, Artificial, Diastole, Electrocardiography, Exercise Tolerance, Female, Heart Failure/diagnostic imaging, Heart Failure/therapy, Humans, Male, Middle Aged, Prospective Studies, Radionuclide Angiography, Treatment Outcome, Ventricular Function, Left
Pubmed
Web of science
Create date
03/03/2024 18:33
Last modification date
11/03/2024 7:17
Usage data