Hyperkalemia or Not? A Diagnostic Pitfall in the Emergency Department.

Details

Ressource 1Download: 39938962.pdf (917.66 [Ko])
State: Public
Version: Final published version
License: CC BY 4.0
Serval ID
serval:BIB_2844B1C1F873
Type
Article: article from journal or magazin.
Collection
Publications
Institution
Title
Hyperkalemia or Not? A Diagnostic Pitfall in the Emergency Department.
Journal
The western journal of emergency medicine
Author(s)
Stephan F.P., Riede F.N., Ünlü L., Capoferri G., Bosia T., Regeniter A., Bingisser R., Nickel C.H.
ISSN
1936-9018 (Electronic)
ISSN-L
1936-900X
Publication state
Published
Issued date
01/2025
Peer-reviewed
Oui
Volume
26
Number
1
Pages
176-179
Language
english
Notes
Publication types: Journal Article
Publication Status: ppublish
Abstract
Hyperkalemia, a potentially life-threatening electrolyte disturbance, is commonly encountered in the Emergency Department (ED). However, the frequency of factitious hyperkalemia, an artificially elevated potassium level in hyperkalemic ED patients, is unknown. This study aims to detect the rate of factitious hyperkalemia among patients with a potassium concentration of ≥5.0 mmol/l in an all-comer ED population.
This retrospective, monocentric chart review analyzed data of 2,440 ED patients who presented with a potassium concentration of ≥5.0 mmol/L in their initial whole blood or plasma sample, who also underwent a repeat potassium measurement on the same day. Two groups were established based on potassium levels in the initial and repeat blood tests: 1) True hyperkalemia, characterized by consistently elevated potassium levels in both the initial and repeat samples; and 2) Factitious hyperkalemia, defined by an elevated initial potassium level while the repeat blood test showed a normal potassium level. A subset of factitious hyperkalemia was spurious hyperkalemia. In spurious hyperkalemia, the initial blood sample showed an elevated potassium level with evidence of hemolysis, but a repeat test revealed a normal potassium level without evidence of hemolysis.
Of the 2,440 patients, 1,576 (65%) had true hyperkalemia and 864 (35%) factitious hyperkalemia. Among the 864 patients with factitious hyperkalemia, 597 (69%) displayed hemolysis in their initial blood sample, indicating spurious hyperkalemia due to in-vitro hemolysis.
These data show that about one third of all hyperkalemic blood samples drawn in the ED were due to factitious hyperkalemia. The leading cause of factitious hyperkalemia was spurious hyperkalemia due to in-vitro hemolysis.
Keywords
Humans, Hyperkalemia/diagnosis, Hyperkalemia/blood, Emergency Service, Hospital, Retrospective Studies, Male, Female, Middle Aged, Potassium/blood, Aged, Adult, Diagnostic Errors, Factitious Disorders/diagnosis, Factitious Disorders/blood
Pubmed
Web of science
Open Access
Yes
Create date
14/02/2025 17:07
Last modification date
15/02/2025 10:01
Usage data