Validation of a Novel Assay to Distinguish Bacterial and Viral Infections

Details

Serval ID
serval:BIB_21C3DC59501B
Type
Article: article from journal or magazin.
Collection
Publications
Title
Validation of a Novel Assay to Distinguish Bacterial and Viral Infections
Journal
Pediatrics
Author(s)
Srugo I., Klein A., Stein M., Golan-Shany O., Kerem N., Chistyakov I., Genizi J., Glazer O., Yaniv L., German A., Miron D., Shachor-Meyouhas Y., Bamberger E., Oved K., Gottlieb T. M., Navon R., Paz M., Etshtein L., Boico O., Kronenfeld G., Eden E., Cohen R., Chappuy H., Angoulvant F., Lacroix L., Gervaix A.
ISSN
1098-4275 (Electronic)
ISSN-L
0031-4005
Publication state
Published
Issued date
10/2017
Volume
140
Number
4
Language
english
Notes
Srugo, Isaac
Klein, Adi
Stein, Michal
Golan-Shany, Orit
Kerem, Nogah
Chistyakov, Irina
Genizi, Jacob
Glazer, Oded
Yaniv, Liat
German, Alina
Miron, Dan
Shachor-Meyouhas, Yael
Bamberger, Ellen
Oved, Kfir
Gottlieb, Tanya M
Navon, Roy
Paz, Meital
Etshtein, Liat
Boico, Olga
Kronenfeld, Gali
Eden, Eran
Cohen, Robert
Chappuy, Helene
Angoulvant, Francois
Lacroix, Laurence
Gervaix, Alain
eng
Clinical Trial
Multicenter Study
Validation Study
2017/09/15
Pediatrics. 2017 Oct;140(4):e20163453. doi: 10.1542/peds.2016-3453. Epub 2017 Sep 13.
Abstract
BACKGROUND: Reliably distinguishing bacterial from viral infections is often challenging, leading to antibiotic misuse. A novel assay that integrates measurements of blood-borne host-proteins (tumor necrosis factor-related apoptosis-inducing ligand, interferon gamma-induced protein-10, and C-reactive protein [CRP]) was developed to assist in differentiation between bacterial and viral disease. METHODS: We performed double-blind, multicenter assay evaluation using serum remnants collected at 5 pediatric emergency departments and 2 wards from children >/=3 months to </=18 years without (n = 68) and with (n = 529) suspicion of acute infection. Infectious cohort inclusion criteria were fever >/=38 degrees C and symptom duration </=7 days. The reference standard diagnosis was based on predetermined criteria plus adjudication by experts blinded to assay results. Assay performers were blinded to the reference standard. Assay cutoffs were predefined. RESULTS: Of 529 potentially eligible patients with suspected acute infection, 100 did not fulfill infectious inclusion criteria and 68 had insufficient serum. The resulting cohort included 361 patients, with 239 viral, 68 bacterial, and 54 indeterminate reference standard diagnoses. The assay distinguished between bacterial and viral patients with 93.8% sensitivity (95% confidence interval: 87.8%-99.8%) and 89.8% specificity (85.6%-94.0%); 11.7% had an equivocal assay outcome. The assay outperformed CRP (cutoff 40 mg/L; sensitivity 88.2% [80.4%-96.1%], specificity 73.2% [67.6%-78.9%]) and procalcitonin testing (cutoff 0.5 ng/mL; sensitivity 63.1% [51.0%-75.1%], specificity 82.3% [77.1%-87.5%]). CONCLUSIONS: Double-blinded evaluation confirmed high assay performance in febrile children. Assay was significantly more accurate than CRP, procalcitonin, and routine laboratory parameters. Additional studies are warranted to support its potential to improve antimicrobial treatment decisions.
Keywords
Adolescent, Bacterial Infections/blood/*diagnosis, Biomarkers/blood, C-Reactive Protein/*metabolism, Chemokine CXCL10/*blood, Child, Child, Preschool, Diagnosis, Differential, Double-Blind Method, Female, Humans, Infant, Male, Prospective Studies, Sensitivity and Specificity, TNF-Related Apoptosis-Inducing Ligand/*blood, Virus Diseases/blood/*diagnosis
Pubmed
Create date
07/02/2025 18:24
Last modification date
08/02/2025 7:27
Usage data