IDentification of patients in need of general and specialised PALLiative care (ID-PALL©): item generation, content and face validity of a new interprofessional screening instrument.

Details

Ressource 1Download: Teike Lüthi_et_al-2020-BMC_Palliative_Care.pdf (590.55 [Ko])
State: Public
Version: Final published version
License: CC BY 4.0
Serval ID
serval:BIB_19A492DB5A66
Type
Article: article from journal or magazin.
Collection
Publications
Institution
Title
IDentification of patients in need of general and specialised PALLiative care (ID-PALL©): item generation, content and face validity of a new interprofessional screening instrument.
Journal
BMC palliative care
Author(s)
Teike Lüthi F., Bernard M., Beauverd M., Gamondi C., Ramelet A.S., Borasio G.D.
ISSN
1472-684X (Electronic)
ISSN-L
1472-684X
Publication state
Published
Issued date
12/02/2020
Peer-reviewed
Oui
Volume
19
Number
1
Pages
19
Language
english
Notes
Publication types: Journal Article
Publication Status: epublish
Abstract
Early identification of patients requiring palliative care is a major public health concern. A growing number of instruments exist to help professionals to identify these patients, however, thus far, none have been thoroughly assessed for criterion validity. In addition, no currently available instruments differentiate between patients in need of general vs. specialised palliative care, and most are primarily intended for use by physicians. This study aims to develop and rigorously validate a new interprofessional instrument allowing identification of patients in need of general vs specialised palliative care.
The instrument development involved four steps: i) literature review to determine the concept to measure; ii) generation of a set of items; iii) review of the initial set of items by experts to establish the content validity; iv) administration of the items to a sample of the target population to establish face validity. We conducted a Delphi process with experts in palliative care to accomplish step 3 and sent a questionnaire to nurses and physicians non-specialised in palliative care to complete step 4. The study was conducted in the French and Italian-speaking regions of Switzerland. An interdisciplinary committee of clinical experts supervised all steps.
The literature review confirmed the necessity of distinguishing between general and specialised palliative care needs and of adapting clinical recommendations to these different needs. Thirty-six nurses and physicians participated in the Delphi process and 28 were involved in the face validity assessment. The Delphi process resulted in two lists: a 7-item list to identify patients in need of general PC and an 8-item list to identify specialised PC needs. The content and face validity were deemed to be acceptable by both the expert and target populations.
This instrument makes a significant contribution to the identification of patients with palliative care needs as it has been designed to differentiate between general and specialised palliative care needs. Moreover, diagnostic data is not fundamental to the use of the instrument, thus facilitating its use by healthcare professionals other than physicians, in particular nurses. Internal and criterion validity assessments are ongoing and essential before wider dissemination of the instrument.
Keywords
Content validity, Identification, Instrument, Interprofessional, Item generation, Palliative care, Screening
Pubmed
Open Access
Yes
Create date
17/02/2020 17:59
Last modification date
23/07/2020 6:22
Usage data