Ethics Priorities of the Curing Coma Campaign: An Empirical Survey.

Details

Ressource 1Request a copy Under indefinite embargo.
UNIL restricted access
State: Public
Version: author
License: Not specified
Serval ID
serval:BIB_16366257F6A6
Type
Article: article from journal or magazin.
Collection
Publications
Institution
Title
Ethics Priorities of the Curing Coma Campaign: An Empirical Survey.
Journal
Neurocritical care
Author(s)
Lewis A., Claassen J., Illes J., Jox R.J., Kirschen M., Rohaut B., Trevick S., Young M.J., Fins J.J.
Working group(s)
and the Curing Coma Campaign and its contributing members
ISSN
1556-0961 (Electronic)
ISSN-L
1541-6933
Publication state
Published
Issued date
08/2022
Peer-reviewed
Oui
Volume
37
Number
1
Pages
12-21
Language
english
Notes
Publication types: Journal Article
Publication Status: ppublish
Abstract
The Curing Coma Campaign (CCC) is a multidisciplinary global initiative focused on evaluation, diagnosis, treatment, research, and prognostication for patients who are comatose due to any etiology. To support this mission, the CCC Ethics Working Group conducted a survey of CCC collaborators to identify the ethics priorities of the CCC and the variability in priorities based on country of practice.
An electronic survey on the ethics priorities for the CCC was developed using rank-choice questions and distributed between May and July 2021 to a listserv of the 164 collaborators of the CCC. The median rank for each topic and subtopic was determined. Comparisons were made on the basis of country of practice.
The survey was completed by 93 respondents (57% response rate); 67% practiced in the United States. On the basis of respondent ranking of each topic, the prioritization of ethics topics across respondents was as follows: (1) clinical care, (2) diagnostic definitions, (3) clinical research, (4) implementation/innovation, (5) family, (6) data management, (7) public engagement/perceptions, and (8) equity. Respondents who practiced in the United States were particularly concerned about public engagement, the distinction between clinical care and research, disclosure of results from clinical research to families, the definition of "personhood," and the distinction between the self-fulfilling prophecy/nihilism and medical futility. Respondents who practiced in other countries were particularly concerned about diagnostic modalities for clinical care, investigational drugs/devices for clinical research, translation of research into practice, and the definition of "minimally conscious state."
Collaborators of the CCC considered clinical care, diagnostic definitions, and clinical research the top ethics priorities of the CCC. These priorities should be considered as the CCC explores ways to improve evaluation, diagnosis, treatment, research, and prognostication of patients with coma and associated disorders of consciousness. There is some variability in ethics priorities based on country of practice.
Keywords
Coma, Disorders of consciousness, End-of-life, Ethics
Pubmed
Web of science
Open Access
Yes
Create date
16/05/2022 7:32
Last modification date
18/07/2022 5:35
Usage data