Stereotactic aspiration alone or Ommaya placement and aspiration followed by stereotactic radiosurgery for cystic brain metastasis: A systematic review and meta-analysis.
Details
Serval ID
serval:BIB_114E80962582
Type
Article: article from journal or magazin.
Collection
Publications
Institution
Title
Stereotactic aspiration alone or Ommaya placement and aspiration followed by stereotactic radiosurgery for cystic brain metastasis: A systematic review and meta-analysis.
Journal
Brain & spine
ISSN
2772-5294 (Electronic)
ISSN-L
2772-5294
Publication state
Published
Issued date
2025
Peer-reviewed
Oui
Volume
5
Pages
104184
Language
english
Notes
Publication types: Journal Article ; Review
Publication Status: epublish
Publication Status: epublish
Abstract
Cystic brain metastases (BMs) are often more challenging to treat than solid BMs. Stereotactic cyst aspiration for volume reduction followed by stereotactic radiosurgery (SRS) is an alternative treatment modality that may benefit patients with large cystic BMs not favorable for SRS alone nor microsurgical resection.
Here, we perform a systematic review and meta-analysis of stereotactic aspiration alone or reservoir (Ommaya) placement plus aspiration followed by SRS for cystic BMs.
Using the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses (PRISMA) guidelines, we reviewed articles published between 1968 and December 31 <sup>-th</sup> , 2022. We retained 10 studies reporting 280 patients.
Overall rate of tumor control for combined treatment of Ommaya placement plus aspiration plus SRS was 81.2% (62.5-99.9%, p < 0.001) and for stereotactic aspiration plus SRS was 64.7% (46.1-83.3%, p < 0.001). Overall rate of further intervention for combined treatment of Ommaya placement plus aspiration plus SRS was 15.8% (p = 0.08) and for stereotactic aspiration plus SRS was 14.8% (5.3-24.4%, p = 0.002). Overall complication rate for combined treatment of Ommaya placement plus aspiration plus SRS was 12.8% (2.3-23.3%, p = 0.01) and for stereotactic aspiration plus SRS was 1.5% (p = 0.12).
Combined treatment of Ommaya placement plus cyst aspiration plus SRS in cystic BMs yields better local control as compared to stereotactic aspiration plus SRS, with similar rate of further intervention between procedures. Aspiration of the cyst plus SRS should be considered for patients with cystic metastases not able to undergo open surgery or upfront SRS.
Here, we perform a systematic review and meta-analysis of stereotactic aspiration alone or reservoir (Ommaya) placement plus aspiration followed by SRS for cystic BMs.
Using the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses (PRISMA) guidelines, we reviewed articles published between 1968 and December 31 <sup>-th</sup> , 2022. We retained 10 studies reporting 280 patients.
Overall rate of tumor control for combined treatment of Ommaya placement plus aspiration plus SRS was 81.2% (62.5-99.9%, p < 0.001) and for stereotactic aspiration plus SRS was 64.7% (46.1-83.3%, p < 0.001). Overall rate of further intervention for combined treatment of Ommaya placement plus aspiration plus SRS was 15.8% (p = 0.08) and for stereotactic aspiration plus SRS was 14.8% (5.3-24.4%, p = 0.002). Overall complication rate for combined treatment of Ommaya placement plus aspiration plus SRS was 12.8% (2.3-23.3%, p = 0.01) and for stereotactic aspiration plus SRS was 1.5% (p = 0.12).
Combined treatment of Ommaya placement plus cyst aspiration plus SRS in cystic BMs yields better local control as compared to stereotactic aspiration plus SRS, with similar rate of further intervention between procedures. Aspiration of the cyst plus SRS should be considered for patients with cystic metastases not able to undergo open surgery or upfront SRS.
Keywords
Brain metastases, Cyst aspiration, Cystic brain metastases, Ommaya reservoir, Stereotactic aspiration, Stereotactic radiosurgery
Pubmed
Web of science
Open Access
Yes
Create date
10/02/2025 15:36
Last modification date
25/02/2025 7:06