Comparative effectiveness of antitumour necrosis factor agents, biologics with an alternative mode of action and tofacitinib in an observational cohort of patients with rheumatoid arthritis in Switzerland.

Details

Serval ID
serval:BIB_0E5A1B7FEE5A
Type
Article: article from journal or magazin.
Collection
Publications
Institution
Title
Comparative effectiveness of antitumour necrosis factor agents, biologics with an alternative mode of action and tofacitinib in an observational cohort of patients with rheumatoid arthritis in Switzerland.
Journal
RMD open
Author(s)
Finckh A., Tellenbach C., Herzog L., Scherer A., Moeller B., Ciurea A., von Muehlenen I., Gabay C., Kyburz D., Brulhart L., Müller R., Hasler P., Zufferey P.
Working group(s)
physicians and patients of the SCQM
ISSN
2056-5933 (Electronic)
ISSN-L
2056-5933
Publication state
Published
Issued date
05/2020
Peer-reviewed
Oui
Volume
6
Number
1
Pages
e001174
Language
english
Notes
Publication types: Comparative Study ; Journal Article ; Observational Study ; Research Support, Non-U.S. Gov't
Publication Status: ppublish
Abstract
Multiple biologic and targeted synthetic disease-modifying rheumatic drugs (b/tsDMARDs) are approved for the management of rheumatoid arthritis (RA), including TNF inhibitors (TNFi), bDMARDs with other modes of action (bDMARD-OMA) and Janus kinase inhibitors (JAKi). Combination of b/tsDMARDs with conventional synthetic DMARDs (csDMARDs) is recommended, yet monotherapy is common in practice.
To compare drug maintenance and clinical effectiveness of three alternative treatment options for RA management.
This observational cohort study was nested within the Swiss RA Registry. TNFi, bDMARD-OMA (abatacept or anti-IL6 agents) or the JAKi tofacitinib (Tofa) initiated in adult RA patients were included. The primary outcome was overall drug retention. We further analysed secondary effectiveness outcomes and whether concomitant csDMARDs modified effectiveness, adjusting for potential confounding factors.
4023 treatment courses of 2600 patients were included, 1862 on TNFi, 1355 on bDMARD-OMA and 806 on Tofa. TNFi was more frequently used as a first b/tsDMARDs, at a younger age and with shorter disease duration. Overall drug maintenance was significantly lower with TNFi compared with Tofa [HR 1.29 (95% CI 1.14 to 1.47)], but similar between bDMARD-OMA and Tofa [HR 1.09 (95% CI 0.96 to 1.24)]. TNFi maintenance was decreased when prescribed without concomitant csDMARDs [HR: 1.27 (95% CI 1.08 to 1.49)], while no difference was observed for bDMARD-OMA or Tofa maintenance with respect to concomitant csDMARDs.
Tofa drug maintenance was comparable with bDMARDs-OMA and somewhat higher than TNFi. Concomitant csDMARDs appear to be required for optimal effectiveness of TNFi, but not for bDMARD-OMA or Tofa.
Keywords
Abatacept/therapeutic use, Adult, Aged, Antirheumatic Agents/therapeutic use, Arthritis, Rheumatoid/drug therapy, Female, Humans, Janus Kinase Inhibitors/therapeutic use, Kaplan-Meier Estimate, Logistic Models, Longitudinal Studies, Male, Middle Aged, Piperidines/therapeutic use, Prospective Studies, Pyrimidines/therapeutic use, Registries, Risk Assessment, Risk Factors, Switzerland, Tumor Necrosis Factor Inhibitors/therapeutic use, abatacept, biological therapies, comparative effectiveness research, rheumatoid arthritis, tocilizumab, tumour necrosis alpha inhibitors
Pubmed
Web of science
Open Access
Yes
Create date
15/06/2020 15:50
Last modification date
12/03/2024 8:07
Usage data