Consistency and reproducibility of next-generation sequencing in cytopathology: A second worldwide ring trial study on improved cytological molecular reference specimens.
Details
Serval ID
serval:BIB_0DE727B0F676
Type
Article: article from journal or magazin.
Collection
Publications
Institution
Title
Consistency and reproducibility of next-generation sequencing in cytopathology: A second worldwide ring trial study on improved cytological molecular reference specimens.
Journal
Cancer cytopathology
Working group(s)
Molecular Cytopathology Meeting Group
ISSN
1934-6638 (Electronic)
ISSN-L
1934-662X
Publication state
Published
Issued date
05/2019
Peer-reviewed
Oui
Volume
127
Number
5
Pages
285-296
Language
english
Notes
Publication types: Journal Article
Publication Status: ppublish
Publication Status: ppublish
Abstract
Artificial genomic reference standards in a cytocentrifuge/cytospin format with well-annotated genomic data are useful for validating next-generation sequencing (NGS) on routine cytopreparations. Here, reference standards were optimized to be stained by different laboratories before DNA extraction and to contain a lower number of cells (2 × 10 <sup>5</sup> ). This was done to better reflect the clinical challenge of working with insufficient cytological material.
A total of 17 worldwide laboratories analyzed customized reference standard slides (slides A-D). Each laboratory applied its standard workflow. The sample slides were engineered to harbor epidermal growth factor receptor (EGFR) c.2235_2249del15 p.E746_A750delELREA, EGFR c.2369C>T p.T790M, Kirsten rat sarcoma viral oncogene homolog (KRAS) c.38G>A p.G13D, and B-Raf proto-oncogene, serine/threonine kinase (BRAF) c.1798_1799GT>AA p.V600K mutations at various allele frequencies (AFs).
EGFR and KRAS mutation detection showed excellent interlaboratory reproducibility, especially on slides A and B (10% and 5% AFs). On slide C (1% AF), either the EGFR mutation or the KRAS mutation was undetected by 10 of the 17 laboratories (58.82%). A reassessment of the raw data in a second-look analysis highlighted the mutations (n = 10) that had been missed in the first-look analysis. BRAF c.1798_1799GT>AA p.V600K showed a lower concordance rate for mutation detection and AF quantification.
The data show that the detection of low-abundance mutations is still clinically challenging and may require a visual inspection of sequencing reads to detect. Genomic reference standards in a cytocentrifuge/cytospin format are a valid tool for regular quality assessment of laboratories performing molecular studies on cytology with low-AF mutations.
A total of 17 worldwide laboratories analyzed customized reference standard slides (slides A-D). Each laboratory applied its standard workflow. The sample slides were engineered to harbor epidermal growth factor receptor (EGFR) c.2235_2249del15 p.E746_A750delELREA, EGFR c.2369C>T p.T790M, Kirsten rat sarcoma viral oncogene homolog (KRAS) c.38G>A p.G13D, and B-Raf proto-oncogene, serine/threonine kinase (BRAF) c.1798_1799GT>AA p.V600K mutations at various allele frequencies (AFs).
EGFR and KRAS mutation detection showed excellent interlaboratory reproducibility, especially on slides A and B (10% and 5% AFs). On slide C (1% AF), either the EGFR mutation or the KRAS mutation was undetected by 10 of the 17 laboratories (58.82%). A reassessment of the raw data in a second-look analysis highlighted the mutations (n = 10) that had been missed in the first-look analysis. BRAF c.1798_1799GT>AA p.V600K showed a lower concordance rate for mutation detection and AF quantification.
The data show that the detection of low-abundance mutations is still clinically challenging and may require a visual inspection of sequencing reads to detect. Genomic reference standards in a cytocentrifuge/cytospin format are a valid tool for regular quality assessment of laboratories performing molecular studies on cytology with low-AF mutations.
Keywords
Biomarkers, Tumor/genetics, Cytodiagnosis/methods, DNA Mutational Analysis/methods, ErbB Receptors/genetics, High-Throughput Nucleotide Sequencing/methods, Humans, Mutation, Neoplasms/diagnosis, Neoplasms/genetics, Proto-Oncogene Proteins B-raf/genetics, Proto-Oncogene Proteins p21(ras)/genetics, Reproducibility of Results, cytological molecular reference, cytology, lung cancer, molecular cytopathology, next-generation sequencing
Pubmed
Web of science
Create date
30/04/2019 15:19
Last modification date
27/04/2020 5:20