Role of myocardial revascularization in postinfarction ventricular septal rupture.
Details
Serval ID
serval:BIB_0CB2BFF25D07
Type
Article: article from journal or magazin.
Collection
Publications
Institution
Title
Role of myocardial revascularization in postinfarction ventricular septal rupture.
Journal
Annals of Thoracic Surgery
ISSN
0003-4975 (Print)
ISSN-L
0003-4975
Publication state
Published
Issued date
2000
Peer-reviewed
Oui
Volume
69
Number
1
Pages
51-55
Language
english
Abstract
BACKGROUND: Postinfarction ventricular septal rupture requires urgent closure. The role of systematic coronarography and coronary revascularization needs clarification.
METHODS: Fifty-four patients who underwent patch closure of postinfarction ventricular septal defect were reviewed. A coronarography had been systematically and myocardial revascularization selectively (when significant coronary artery stenosis existed) performed.
RESULTS: No patient died or deteriorated during coronarography. Twenty-six patients showed no coronary artery disease besides the infarct-related artery, and 28 had associated disease. Threatened myocardial territories were revascularized usually with venous grafts (mean number of distal anastomosis, 2.5). Operative mortality was 19% and 32% (p = 0.36) and late mortality 43% and 53% (p = 0.75) in patients without and in patients with associated coronary artery disease, respectively. Survival curve in both group was similar, at least up to 8 years after operation.
CONCLUSIONS: Myocardial revascularization controlled the added risk of associated coronary artery disease in the postoperative period and in median term. A coronarography should be performed in all patients who can be stabilized hemodynamically and myocardial revascularization performed in case of significant stenosis.
METHODS: Fifty-four patients who underwent patch closure of postinfarction ventricular septal defect were reviewed. A coronarography had been systematically and myocardial revascularization selectively (when significant coronary artery stenosis existed) performed.
RESULTS: No patient died or deteriorated during coronarography. Twenty-six patients showed no coronary artery disease besides the infarct-related artery, and 28 had associated disease. Threatened myocardial territories were revascularized usually with venous grafts (mean number of distal anastomosis, 2.5). Operative mortality was 19% and 32% (p = 0.36) and late mortality 43% and 53% (p = 0.75) in patients without and in patients with associated coronary artery disease, respectively. Survival curve in both group was similar, at least up to 8 years after operation.
CONCLUSIONS: Myocardial revascularization controlled the added risk of associated coronary artery disease in the postoperative period and in median term. A coronarography should be performed in all patients who can be stabilized hemodynamically and myocardial revascularization performed in case of significant stenosis.
Pubmed
Web of science
Create date
16/12/2014 19:06
Last modification date
20/08/2019 12:34