Comparaison de cinq méthodes de mesure subjectives de la torsion oculaire [Comparison of five methods for subjective assessment of ocular cyclodeviation]

Details

Serval ID
serval:BIB_0ACC3B1D8BE0
Type
Article: article from journal or magazin.
Collection
Publications
Institution
Title
Comparaison de cinq méthodes de mesure subjectives de la torsion oculaire [Comparison of five methods for subjective assessment of ocular cyclodeviation]
Journal
Klinische Monatsblatter fur Augenheilkunde
Author(s)
Klainguti G., Strickler J., Chamero J.
ISSN
0023-2165 (Print)
ISSN-L
0023-2165
Publication state
Published
Issued date
05/1992
Peer-reviewed
Oui
Volume
200
Number
5
Pages
409-413
Language
french
Notes
Publication types: Comparative Study ; English Abstract ; Journal Article
Publication Status: ppublish
Abstract
1. simple Maddox rod (Franceschetti) 2. set of scaled large diameter Maddox rods 3. synoptophore 4. synoptometer (Cüppers) 5. dark red glass in front of the Harms tangent scale (Kolling). Whereas the first two methods allow to measure in primary position only, the other three also permit secondary and tertiary position measurements. Thirty normal subjects underwent comparative measurements by means of the above techniques in monocular and binocular condition. The median values indicate that all these methods are reliable but that certain specific differences influence the results. For this reason, pre- and postoperative measurements of ocular torsion should always be performed by the same method. The most appropriate techniques have shown to be: the set of scaled Maddox rods for measurements in primary position only, the dark red glass in front of the Harms tangent screen for measuring also in secondary and tertiary positions.
Keywords
Convergence, Ocular/physiology, Humans, Reference Values, Strabismus/diagnosis, Strabismus/physiopathology, Vision Tests/instrumentation, Vision, Binocular/physiology
Pubmed
Web of science
Create date
06/10/2022 12:01
Last modification date
10/02/2024 8:15
Usage data