Switch to Sirolimus-based immunosuppresion in stable renal transplant recipients

Details

Serval ID
serval:BIB_05B0BF2535BA
Type
Inproceedings: an article in a conference proceedings.
Publication sub-type
Abstract (Abstract): shot summary in a article that contain essentials elements presented during a scientific conference, lecture or from a poster.
Collection
Publications
Institution
Title
Switch to Sirolimus-based immunosuppresion in stable renal transplant recipients
Title of the conference
40th Annual Meeting Swiss Society of Nephrology
Author(s)
Nseir G., Venetz J.P, Hadaya K., Buhler L., Martin P.Y., Pascual M.
Address
St. Gallen, Switzerland, December 3-5, 2008
ISBN
1424-7860
Publication state
Published
Issued date
2008
Peer-reviewed
Oui
Volume
138
Series
Swiss Medical Weekly
Pages
18S
Language
english
Notes
Publication type : Meeting Abstract
Abstract
Purpose: Sirolimus (SRL) has been used to replace calcineurin
inhibitors (CNI) for various indications including CNI-induced toxicity.
The aim of this study was to evaluate the efficacy and safety of
switching from CNI to SRL in stable renal transplant recipients (RTR)
with low grade proteinuria (<1 g/24 h).
Methods and materials: Between 2001 and 2007, 41 patients (20
females, 21 males; mean age 47 ± 13) were switched after a median
time post-transplantation of 73.5 months (range 0.2-273.2 months).
Indications for switch were CNI nephrotoxicity (39%), thrombotic
micro-angiopathy (14.6%), post-transplantation cancer (24.4%), CNI
neurotoxicity (7.4%), or others (14.6%). Mean follow-up after SRL
switch was 23.8±16.3 months. Mean SRL dosage and through levels
were 2.4 ± 1.1 mg/day and 8 ± 2.2 ug/l respectively. Immunosuppressive
regiments were SRL + mycophenolate mofetil (MMF)
(31.7%), SRL + MMF + prednisone (36.58%), SRL + prednisone
(19.51%), SRL + Azathioprine (9.75%), or SRL alone (2.43%).
Results: Mean creatinine decreased from 164 to 143 μmol/l (p <0.03),
mean estimated glomerular filtration rate (eGFR) increased
significantly from 50.13 to 55.01 ml/minute (p <0.00001), mean
systolic and diastolic blood pressure decreased from 138 to 132 mm
Hg (p <0.03) and from 83 to78 mm Hg (p <0.01), but mean proteinuria
increased from 0.21 to 0.63 g/24 h (p <0.001). While mean total
cholesterolemia didn't increased significantly from 5.09 to 5.56
mmol/l (p = 0.06). The main complications after SRL switch were
dermatitis (19.5%), urinary tract infections (24.4%), ankle edema
(13.3%), and transient oral ulcers (20%). Acute rejection after the
switch occurred in 7.3% of patients (n = 3), and 2 acute rejections
were successfully treated with corticosteroids and 1 did not respond
to treatment (not related to switch). SRL had to be discontinued in
17% of patients (2 nephrotic syndromes, 2 severe edema, 1 acute
rejection, 1 thrombotic micro-angiopathy, and 1 fever).
Conclusion: In conclusion, we found that switching from CNI to SRL
in stable RTR was safe and associated with a significant improvement
of renal function and blood pressure. Known side-effects of SRL led
to drug discontinuation in less than 20% of patients and the acute
rejection rate was 7.3%. This experience underlines the importance of
patient selection before switching to SRL, in particular regarding preswitch
proteinuria.
Keywords
,
Web of science
Create date
24/08/2010 16:58
Last modification date
20/08/2019 13:27
Usage data