Noninvasive estimation of aortic hemodynamics and cardiac contractility using machine learning.

Details

Serval ID
serval:BIB_055E98DA1546
Type
Article: article from journal or magazin.
Collection
Publications
Title
Noninvasive estimation of aortic hemodynamics and cardiac contractility using machine learning.
Journal
Scientific reports
Author(s)
Bikia V., Papaioannou T.G., Pagoulatou S., Rovas G., Oikonomou E., Siasos G., Tousoulis D., Stergiopulos N.
ISSN
2045-2322 (Electronic)
ISSN-L
2045-2322
Publication state
Published
Issued date
14/09/2020
Peer-reviewed
Oui
Volume
10
Number
1
Pages
15015
Language
english
Notes
Publication types: Journal Article
Publication Status: epublish
Abstract
Cardiac and aortic characteristics are crucial for cardiovascular disease detection. However, noninvasive estimation of aortic hemodynamics and cardiac contractility is still challenging. This paper investigated the potential of estimating aortic systolic pressure (aSBP), cardiac output (CO), and end-systolic elastance (E <sub>es</sub> ) from cuff-pressure and pulse wave velocity (PWV) using regression analysis. The importance of incorporating ejection fraction (EF) as additional input for estimating E <sub>es</sub> was also assessed. The models, including Random Forest, Support Vector Regressor, Ridge, Gradient Boosting, were trained/validated using synthetic data (n = 4,018) from an in-silico model. When cuff-pressure and PWV were used as inputs, the normalized-RMSEs/correlations for aSBP, CO, and E <sub>es</sub> (best-performing models) were 3.36 ± 0.74%/0.99, 7.60 ± 0.68%/0.96, and 16.96 ± 0.64%/0.37, respectively. Using EF as additional input for estimating E <sub>es</sub> significantly improved the predictions (7.00 ± 0.78%/0.92). Results showed that the use of noninvasive pressure measurements allows estimating aSBP and CO with acceptable accuracy. In contrast, E <sub>es</sub> cannot be predicted from pressure signals alone. Addition of the EF information greatly improves the estimated E <sub>es</sub> . Accuracy of the model-derived aSBP compared to in-vivo aSBP (n = 783) was very satisfactory (5.26 ± 2.30%/0.97). Future in-vivo evaluation of CO and E <sub>es</sub> estimations remains to be conducted. This novel methodology has potential to improve the noninvasive monitoring of aortic hemodynamics and cardiac contractility.
Keywords
Aorta/physiology, Heart/physiology, Hemodynamics, Humans, Machine Learning, Models, Cardiovascular, Myocardial Contraction
Pubmed
Web of science
Open Access
Yes
Create date
19/09/2020 13:06
Last modification date
19/02/2024 10:34
Usage data