Consensus of Official Position of IOF/ISCD FRAX Initiatives in Asia-Pacific Region.

Details

Serval ID
serval:BIB_007867D351DD
Type
Article: article from journal or magazin.
Publication sub-type
Review (review): journal as complete as possible of one specific subject, written based on exhaustive analyses from published work.
Collection
Publications
Institution
Title
Consensus of Official Position of IOF/ISCD FRAX Initiatives in Asia-Pacific Region.
Journal
Journal of Clinical Densitometry
Author(s)
Wu C.H., McCloskey E.V., Lee J.K., Itabashi A., Prince R., Yu W., Li-Yu J., Chionh S.B., Zhao Y., Shin C.S., Gunawan T., Tsai K.S., Chieng P.U., Changlai S.P., Chan D.C., Chen J.F., Tanner S.B., Hans D.B., Kanis J.A., Chang Y.F., Sun Z.J., Yang R.S.
Working group(s)
Asia Pacific Panel of ISCD
ISSN
1094-6950 (Print)
ISSN-L
1094-6950
Publication state
Published
Issued date
2014
Peer-reviewed
Oui
Volume
17
Number
1
Pages
150-155
Language
english
Notes
Publication types: Journal Article Publication Status: ppublish
Abstract
The fracture risk assessment tool (FRAX(®)) has been developed for the identification of individuals with high risk of fracture in whom treatment to prevent fractures would be appropriate. FRAX models are not yet available for all countries or ethnicities, but surrogate models can be used within regions with similar fracture risk. The International Society for Clinical Densitometry (ISCD) and International Osteoporosis Foundation (IOF) are nonprofit multidisciplinary international professional organizations. Their visions are to advance the awareness, education, prevention, and treatment of osteoporosis. In November 2010, the IOF/ISCD FRAX initiative was held in Bucharest, bringing together international experts to review and create evidence-based official positions guiding clinicians for the practical use of FRAX. A consensus meeting of the Asia-Pacific (AP) Panel of the ISCD recently reviewed the most current Official Positions of the Joint Official Positions of ISCD and IOF on FRAX in view of the different population characteristics and health standards in the AP regions. The reviewed position statements included not only the key spectrum of positions but also unique concerns in AP regions.
Pubmed
Web of science
Create date
10/01/2014 11:59
Last modification date
20/08/2019 13:22
Usage data